The Fediverse Is Already Dead
nora.codes
nora.codes
I think she has a valid point that it's often misleading to refer to "the fediverse" as a holistic thing when it's really a network of wildly different small communities. However, you could say the same about Twitter or Tumblr or HN or New York City or really any social place above a certain size.
I honestly haven't understood at all what the problem with Mastodon was. If anyone could explain this, I'd be grateful.
"This looks interesting. What web site do I go to to sign up and start using this? Huh, there are unnecessary hoops to jump through. I can't be bothered with this right now. Maybe I'll look into this again later."
And later never came.
It's not a bad thing in itself. The fediverse is not just another service, another app, another social network. It's a way to organize together as a society, as a group of humans. It might take time to understand how it works, but it's worth it.
The argument then seems to boil down to, that this does not lend itself well to marketing the platform. But this is a general issue with technologies, which require some thought to use (An unsolved problem, I suspect the issue lies with the people and not the technologies. Better education anyone?). Although the pointers on which language might better describe the thing when doing the social wrangling of marketing it seem quite useful.