Snow Crash Related Items Auction
sothebys.com
sothebys.com
Is it just me? I like books like the three body problem that are entertaining but snow crash was like a much much worse version of the da Vinci code with some VR thrown in.
Da Vinci Code was released after Snow Crash and VR was different in 1993.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1629161748812156929.html
0: https://twitter.com/nealstephenson/status/162916174881215692...
I kept waiting for a return to that awesomeness for like 20 years before I gave up.
I'm a big Stephenson fan, and I find his post-Cryptonomicon stuff more focused (or at least more cohesive? Structurally cogent?) on a conceptual level. I revisited Snow Crash a few years ago, and liked it much, much less than I remembered - I wouldn't describe it as a disciplined novel. It's a baggy mess with the same maximalist bent of his later work. it's a discursive, meandering story that synthesizes disparate concepts in a very fun way. But, it never gels too well; it sort of feels like he lashed a hyper-globalized-strip-mall-hellscape dystopia to a parody of the cyberpunk aesthetic, and superglued both of those things to Julian Jaynes. It just happens to indulge his maximalist tendencies in a smaller page budget, and fails to get the best of either a short novel or a big messy "idea-novel."
Don't get me wrong, like you, I found the first reading of Snow Crash a formative experience as a SF fan. But I'd also never read anything like cyberpunk; I was solidly a Niven Kid in middle school, completely ignorant of post-New Wave SF. I think a lot of what I found special as a kid was actually done better elsewhere.
In terms of that "90's Retrofuturistic So-Cal Strip Mall Apocalypse" brand of cyberpunk, I think William Gibson's Virtual Light was far more satisfying to revisit. It's a more assured, contained novel, and to my surprise, I think the relative restraint yields a much funnier novel than Snow Crash.
Are you looking to be delighted by words rather than ideas? Perhaps I'm extrapolating a bit here, but you seem you like your complex language constructs, so to speak?
English is a second language to me. I wonder if this isn't also a factor.
The ideas in Snow Crash where really the most important things.. next to brilliant writing style (the deliverator...).
Possibly! Prose style is pretty important to me. On the other hand, that's not something I generally complain about with Stephenson. Even when he misfires, the result is usually entertaining. Being bland is a bigger sin, IMO, and not one he commits often.
I think the two go hand-in-hand for me. Having both is best, but I'll take either.
> but you seem you like your complex language constructs, so to speak?
Hah, my writing style owes to more to me not taking the time to edit that I should. Also ADHD. Probably both.
> English is a second language to me. I wonder if isn't also a factor.
Hm. I don't know! I could see some of the sections being a real slog, though.
> The ideas in Snow Crash where really the most important things.. next to brilliant writing style (the deliverator...).
I love the collection of ideas, it was a fun bit of sci-fi! I just felt like it was missing something to really make it fit together better.
I agree that the writing is a ton of fun in it too, I love the opening bit describing how the Uncle Enzo's Pizza company runs a whole battery of experiments to try and understand why people are so aggressive about late pizza. I think about this stretch and laugh very hard every once in a while: "... [Uncle Enzo's Pizza's researchers] studied their brain waves as they showed them choppy, inexplicable movies of porn queens and late-night car crashes and Sammy Davis, Jr., put them in sweet-smelling, mauve-walled rooms and asked them questions about Ethics so perplexing that even a Jesuit couldn’t respond without committing a venial sin."
I mean, Snow Crash still works great as an adventure yarn, right up until the entire caper is resolved by Hiro running a program he was programming in the background between scenes.
The Diamond Age was much more meandering and plotted in a confusing way, even if it had better world-building.
See also "Islands in the Net" by Bruce Sterling (IMNHO).
Ed: BTW, for a newer book (2017) that plays with some interesting concepts - see "Gnomon" by Nick Harkaway. Just don't read a summary or too much about before you start - much of the pleasure I found in it was trying to "figure out" the book as I read it...
I thought "Snow Crash" was fun, and "Diamond Age" is one of my favorite books - although - come to think of it - it's probably about time I read it again...
Also REAMDE was fun, maybe he wasn't trying as hard but I liked that.
I'm in the same boat for Daemon+Freedom(tm)
neal, call me, baby.
From the listing.
Though I'd pay a bit more not to have the NFT. :P
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1995/02/21/... [2] https://best-sci-fi-books.com/the-bestselling-science-fictio...
It might not be a bad time to cash in on that nostalgia and new money, especially if you feel bearish about how those concepts are being reified today.