It has to be noted though that it is very difficult to "just like" a piece of art for good reasons. Art historically had a function: religious, mystic, political... and we're still stuck with this legacy. The function of art has only recently been deemed to be a raw trigger of raw emotions. For better or for worse, I can't say. Probably both.
It also seems to me that "having nothing in mind" is polysemic and I'd be interested in knowing which prevails or how they coexist for the artist. "I had no intention", "I had no goal" and "My mind was blank" (is it even possible?) draw 3 very different intentions.
Again, it's a very interesting approach. One might argue that it is too formalized, elaborate and sophisticated of an approach only to claim that the creation process is "with nothing in mind", but I don't think that the intensity of the concept and the outcome have to align in all points. The only certainty. here is that it cannot be categorized as naive.
Which brings us to the audience. The audience for this project clearly is an educated one, one that met the struggles of having to comment and understand a piece of art and the ridiculous situations and discussions that often ensue to battle over who has the biggest one (brains, I mean).
And look at my own comment... full of gibberish and not a single word on the art pieces themselves. I quite like them though. Shapes, colors, textures, they're beautiful.