In short corruption is a symptom, trying to stop the least objectionable types of it will merely drive it underground and more direct. The problem we need to solve is the ability of corruption to be successful.
In short corruption is a symptom, trying to stop the least objectionable types of it will merely drive it underground and more direct. The problem we need to solve is the ability of corruption to be successful.
A company should not be concerned with whether or not it has enough influence in Washington relative to its competitors.
I'd speculate that for most industries the latter tends to be a higher level of concern than the former, and that is not in any way ok.
You're confusing "MUST" (actually SHOULD) with "CAN".
Look into regulatory capture. You can't ignore it or legislate it away any more than you can ignore or legislate away gravity.
Representatives without sufficient capital to finance their own campaigns rely on being in their financiers' (corporations) good graces. That means strategically putting their fingers in every industry.
There's no solution to the government industrial complex without campaign finance reform.