First we release the product because we can make money, then problems appear as adoption ramps up. I find it wonderful we're still around to be honest.
Now balancing progress with safety is something we're going to be debating for a few more centuries because no company can afford a thirty year study on a product to understand its long term effects on a population before production. So we're all the experiment.
Social media is alcohol for narcissists. It provides very little utility or value, and the drawbacks (depression, FOMO, etc) far outweigh any "benefit".
Don't compare apples and oranges.
People love to harp on fossil fuels but don't seem to want to admit that without it, everyone on the planet would still be suffering pre-industrial living standards and there would be vastly fewer of us.
HN does not equal TikTok. You don't have an actual argument, you're just buttmad because you don't like the fact that I'm correct.
Granted, the scale of the problems are different, and the axis onto which they act is also different. But I stand by my comparison.
There are significant biological differences - for instance, when you restrict calories your metabolism slows down as much as 15-25% over the first three weeks (hence the plateau many dieters experience). Fasting on the other hand raises your metabolic rate up to ~15% for the first 5 days of a water fast. Further, production of HGH is inhibited by consuming any food and while fasting it can increase 3-12X. Autophagy is inhibited by the consumption of any protein (via mTOR).
If you want to treat fasting as the special case diet where input=0, I certainly understand that. However, the physiological processes of caloric restriction are quite different than total abstention.
There's no evidence to support that link - what is provable though is the fierce opposition of the GQP, the far-right and conspiracy preachers to mask mandates and even stuff as basic as vaccines.
If you read what I wrote though, you'd realize I'm acknowledging very clearly that other factors played a larger part, without trying to make this a pointlessly political conversation. So, please don't do that, it does not improve the discourse on HN.