Hacker News Reader

Im sorry but this is just absurd conspiracy psychobabble. Throw words and buzzphrases together as much as you like, there is still no coherent understanding or argument behind your post. "The government" (or the Illuminati, or the Jews, or ...) wanting XYZ from you because they are evil/malicious/warmongering/control freaks is just a trope.

There is no reason why "the government" (who exactly?) needs a control mechanism in order to biologically profile and radicalise you. None of this babble passes Ockham's razor or basic reason.

Look social media is not a basic single digit mental arithmetic test, you have to view it in the context of Divergent Thinking.

The Brick Test is a simple example, how many uses can you come up with for a house brick?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilford%27s_Alternate_Uses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_thinking

Anyway I could argue you are using rule 4 from the section Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation found on this webpage https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

There are many tentacles to the state, which in itself can create cognitive dissonance, but the other problem you have is, you cant kill an idea. Take your anger out on a cop, the law prosecutes you for murder of a human, not a uniform, ergo you cant kill an idea, like law, religion & money.

lots of writing pre-modernity used to be satire, and with serious underlying warnings weaved throughout it hyperbole

why must every piece of shared information be viewed through the lens of conspiracies and mental instability?

i feel the tireless, never ending scroll has taken away peoples creative interpretations above all else

Are you just trying to fuck up my youtube account or what?

Make your point without the nonsense.

I've treated you in the way as a search engine giving you results would, but I'm aware you cant complain back at the search engine.

Have you ever read “The Chaos Machine” by Max Fisher?

No, but a precis on it suggests its the algorithms at fault, much like this Ted talk I have seen. https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_b...

> have them carryout a variety of Darwinism tasks,

What do you mean by that? And how is this currently achieved?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_challenges

https://scholar.google.ru/scholar?q=dangerous+social+media+c...

https://poisoncontrol.utah.edu/news/2022/12/dangerous-social...

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-09-social-media-pose-dan...

Plenty more of these links.

> Social media is a psychological weapon that leaves no physical evidence which is why the state is making a big play on mental health.

Bingo. The entire thing is a psyop designed to artificially limit and homogenize groups to make them more predictable and easier to control.

I think its an extension of the divide and conquer mentality that has existed since Roman times.

Govts are always looking to control the population, especially the military, police and media but it starts in the classroom with not running in the corridors, being made to sit for extended periods of time which makes it a stress position in some military circles.

Just look at the rivalry or disputes between different geographic regions like Europe or the Balkans, some disputes have gone of for so many generations that nobody knows what the original dispute is for.

So when you say its a psyop, yes I would say social media is, but its been hijacked by everyone and anyone. Take the Angry Karen meme, https://www.reddit.com/r/AngryKaren/

I heard this was a business interests invention to reduce the number of items women return for exchange or refund as they are the traditional shopper who do the returns. Look at how that has morphed on social media, its also a way to highlight female abuse to challenge the normal or traditional view of women in society.

In my opinion, I think alot of women become psychotic once they have kids due to the demands on their body, as whilst there is some tacit recognition of post partum psychosis, I think alot of goes unrecognised by the medical experts, in much the same way the belief in religion is a lawful medically unrecognised form of delusional thinking.