Show HN: Skimling - A Platform to Help Kids Improve Their Writing
skimling.com
skimling.com
1. Most teachers are willing to help out students. Why would a student pay for your service?
2. An obvious answer to the above is "we'll focus on the students that have teachers that are unwilling to help". From my experience, that's a small market.
3. You also have to consider that the ones who would be interested in this service are ones who really want to have a good essay (I'll come back to this later); the union of the two sets is even smaller. I'm not entirely sure you would be able to churn profits from just this subset.
4. Moving beyond teachers, how will you compete with EssayJudge? They offer an amazing service for nothing. The quality of their service is hard to beat already, and their price impossible to overcome.
5. How will you vet the quality of your "teachers"? If a student isn't happy with the response, will you refund the money? What if your customers are immoral? (I've found that the union of immoral people and students is quite large.) Looking on HN, I see somebody mentioning "chargebacks"; that would indeed be a big problem.
6. What is your target market? Are you aiming for people who want to buy ghostwriters, or are you aiming for people who simply want to get a good grade (from "Doing well on essays is part of doing well in school, and doing well in school leads to a better life!", that seems to be your target audience), or are you aiming for people who really want to improve their writing? It seems that you're focusing on the penultimate, but is that really a good decision? Why wouldn't they just hire a ghostwriter instead?
7. An easy answer is "they're pretty good writers already, they just need that little bit of editing". If so, it looks like you're focusing on the last group. That's where the money lies, but your advertising doesn't seem to be targeted towards them.
This is by no means a complete list of the problems you'll face. You should probably have answers to many of these before starting/going forwards though.
My gut feeling would be that people reviewing student work because it means something to them would do better work than those who are in it for a token amount.
I'll fix It as soon as I get home. Thanks for pointing it out!
Now consider chargebacks. Stripe charges a 15 dollar fee per chargeback. So for each chargeback you lose (15+10+1.25(transaction fees above) = 26.25 or so. I have a feeling you will have a larger than average number of chargebacks due to children borrowing their parent's credit card to get their essay graded.
I assume you are paying the teachers as independent contractors? Are you prepared to issue 1099's to all of them at the end of the year?
And not to sound too harsh but nothing on this site looks professional at all. It reads like it was written by a Nigerian scammer.
EDIT: fixed my math
You need to think harder about quality control. A simple email-based dispute process is a start, but you need more. How about teacher rating? Teacher credentials, etc.
I would work on improving the copy, especially because this is a writing-related startup.
Fewer exclamation points and fewer words will help.
That line is particularly appalling and represents one of the many things that is wrong with our education system. That logical progression is what encourages people to cheat (plagiarism and paying for essays count).
Maybe try something more like "Getting feedback and incorporating it into your thought and work process will help you get it right the next time for your whole life."
(Yes, many people do fine with low levels of formal education. However, many or most of them are curious, self-educated,and self educating people with good habits.)
The founder is also the one who goes over the essays. His comments are amazing, and his price can't be beat.
Ruh roh! :p
Copy is dense.
Price seems off. Maybe $12 per semester or something.
How does it compare to the competition?
Anyways, I would love to talk to you about some ideas I think would be helpful. It doesn't seem like you have any contact information on the site (a big problem), nor on your profile. If you want to talk, you can find my contact information in my profile.
I would definitely suggest adding your contact information on the site first. That'd be helpful for anybody who wants more information.
Under this system, an important feature, down the line, is a rating system for the teachers to help students find quality editors.
Really cool idea that I definitely see scaling to even more complex project assistance. Maybe you could create a healthy teaching consulting ecosystem? Good luck!
There's no shame in building an amazing product that isn't a platform!
Given those two options why would a student pay for this service and why would the grad student work for you instead of their university's program?