Btw, we all have our source in git or mercurial (vcs with full history) with an offsite repo, right? also, RAID isn't a backup. How many lessons do people need to keep relearning?
Btw, we all have our source in git or mercurial (vcs with full history) with an offsite repo, right? also, RAID isn't a backup. How many lessons do people need to keep relearning?
Let me repeat: "Keeping anything important in one place is a bad idea"
http://serverfault.com/questions/2888/why-is-raid-not-a-back...
But backup is a separate copy of your data set aside for emergencies, while raid just increases the reliability of your one, in use, copy of the data.
Heres an example: You just accidentally dropped a table from your database. Can you recover it with a backup? Can you recover it with RAID?
If its music/movies it's not that big an issue to get 1 corrupted file, on the other hand, corruption on critical work files could be a disaster.
I say RAID is fine for a media NAS box, but for critical business files, a more thorough backup strategy is required...
In that case I still wouldn't call it a backup. I'd just say that the array itself was failure-resistant enough that you've chosen not to maintain a backup.