Maybe Boeing would like to make a project like this, using Python, but running on actual aircraft with passengers.
More likely so some of the passengers is trying traffic a snake or two.
Boeing lost hundreds of millions (that it already worked into its budget) from cancelled orders alone. Just because the law didn't do enough according to you, doesn't mean you should be okay with (let alone advocate for) people dying just to teach a company a lesson.
What you want is for a company whose planes end up causing catastrophe to stay in business and never make planes like that again, because no one wins when a large aircraft manufacturer gets shut down. I would like to see all the execs involved in pushing through the "no no it's still a 737 no new training required" bullshit to get fired on the spot, without bonuses, but that's not my call to make, nor even the law's. Unless they want to sue each exec individually, which would have to be brought before the courts by "not the government". Because government is (for good reasons) not allows to meddle with how a private company is structured internally.
Well then you disagree with Boeing and the aviation regulators then.
>Just because the law didn't do enough according to you, doesn't mean you should be okay with (let alone advocate for) people dying just to teach a company a lesson.
Many more will die because the regulators aren't regulating and no one has been held responsible.
>Because government is (for good reasons) not allows to meddle with how a private company is structured internally.
So mass murder is Ok as long as it's done by a corporate executive?
If the reality of living in a country with a constitution, constitutional amendments, as well as a litany of tort and criminal law (and subsequent case law for both) that all dictate what the government can and cannot do feels libertarian to you, I have some unfortunate news for you.