Recovery at California's most beleaguered reservoir
cnn.com
cnn.com
Actual data is here: https://cdec.water.ca.gov/resapp/RescondMain. It seems Lake Oroville, the resevoir featured in the article, and Cachuma are the only ones that are well above historical average.
The reservoir from the article (Oroville) is one of the only ones to have made such a recovery.
I wonder if this is a custom visualization pattern, or if there is general a name for this type of visualization. Does any one know?
https://engaging-data.com/california-reservoirs-and-snowpack...
Lake Oroville is at 115%. New Bullards is at 120%, Pine Flat is at 121%, Folsom and Camanche at 111%.
https://imgur.io/gallery/mpUge
The huge draw-downs caused by industry and especially agriculture trying to grow things in areas that don't have nearly the water to support such crops, is doing irreparable harm to the planet. Shrinking aquifers dramatically reduces that area's resiliency to drought.
I am surprised I have to spell this out, HN doesn't seem to represent the levels of rigor I have come to expect.
I am surprised I have to explain good faith discussion to you, something I assumed was part of our culture here.
The thing I believe you're missing is that new knowledge gained by solving one problem also solves many other future problems. But because some problems are so big (massive suffering and extinction), and there are infinitely many of them, the only game in town is to make progress as quickly as possible. Otherwise we're just waiting around to be obliterated.
Anyhow, maybe you will find this point of view enlightening. If you have 30 minutes it just might broaden your perspective. I would welcome your thoughts in response: https://youtu.be/01C3a4fL1m0
Edit: @bitxbitxbitcoin: Thank you for the quick info, much appreciated. The questions are genuine, not a water system expert here.
Also, no reservoir anywhere is only used for almond watering. That’s hyperbolic. Almond farmers get thirsty too.
:)
The pipes taking it to your tap and added chemicals are a much higher risk.