And no, it's not an elitist "I'm just so much smarter than the people dancing" thing, like the post seems to imply.
And no, it's not an elitist "I'm just so much smarter than the people dancing" thing, like the post seems to imply.
They will believe they can show you better and make you like it, and thus will try to obnoxiously persuade you to dance with them.
It's just rude.
And the attitude of yours is also part of the problem:
Believing that somehow grown up people are incapable of learning the very basic fact "dancing can be fun" on their own and need to be told about it and nudged towards it.
No, they don't, they know it can be enjoyable, and they have tried, and it isn't for them, and they don't need to be educated any further.
A little gentle nudging followed by respecting the other person's choice is the way to go. But some people can't seem to compute the fact that there are legitimate reasons some people don't enjoy dancing, and take it as an almost personal affront.
If I'm playing Smash Brothers at a party, I'll totally try to get people involved, even if they don't look interested. But some people don't enjoy video games, and some people just don't like fighting games, so I don't physically force the controller into their hands, claiming "you'll have fun if you just loosen up!"
I DONT LIKE DANCING. I DONT LIKE THE THING THAT YOU LIKE.
1) give in and pretend to go along with it.
2) look like an asshole at a wedding.
Sorry if I don’t want to ruin someone’s wedding lol.
I definitely acknowledge gp’s point, it’s important to respect people’s boundaries and not push them into things they don’t want to be pushed into. I just hope you know that nudging often comes from people who like you and want to share joy with you.
My preferred manner of nudging is to 1. make a fool out of myself to clear space and 2. try and get people on the sidelines to do the smallest dance possible. Wiggle your pinkies, tap your toes, feel your way into it :)
I'm just not made for dancing. I suck at it, and even if I "loosen up" I'm still awful.
It's best for all if I just sit in the corner with my phone reading hackernews. Trust me.
Our just dance like nobody's watching. Elaine sure does.
So it's not a "god given duty to convince", it's just that it's a genuine act of friendship and support that a lot of people need. The thing is, unless you know somebody incredibly well, there's really no way to tell who needs the convincing and then will enjoy it, and who doesn't and won't enjoy dancing even after they're convinced.
So people try to convince you for a bit, and if you still refuse, then they leave you alone. It seems like a workable compromise. Same as trying to invite you to a party three times and then giving up when you say you're really not coming.
So I agree it's annoying when you really don't want to do something. But I hope you can understand that it is other people genuinely trying to be helpful, in a way that is often helpful for others. Sometimes people really do need help to overcome shyness, even when they already want to.
And what they forget while doing that is that they are not the only person existing in the universe:
Others will also attempt to convince the very same non-dancing person to dance.
So if you are at a party, sitting at the bar not dancing, you will have to have this discussion like 5 times in a single evening.
And if you enjoy going to parties even though you don't dance and therefore go regularly, then over the decades you will have to have the discussion thousands of times - which isn't a workable compromise anymore but just an annoyance.
You could apply it to anything. If I went along to a LAN party or an arcade and then said "I don't play video games" people would think I had a stick up my arse and they'd be right.
If you really don't enjoy it then it's normal to not go along to those sort of events, there's nothing weird about that.
> If you really don't enjoy it then it's normal to not go along to those sort of events
I guess I'll just never go to a wedding again, or a live music event, or a house party, or any of the other random events where dancing happens but isn't necessarily the focus.
I mean, yeah, you come off as a bit weird. Sorry. It's fairly integral to all three. Maybe not the wedding depending on the couple.
"Maybe" implying that there are weddings I shouldn't attend because I don't like dancing?
And I shouldn't go to live music or house parties because it's weird to do so if I don't like dancing?
Nahh, miss me with that. This is exactly what I mean. The only weird thing here is the idea that I shouldn't go out and have fun with friends because I don't like to dance. People are so weird about it, and treat it almost like a sacred act.
If your friends like to dance and you're sat in the corner on your phone then you look like a weirdo. That doesn't mean you can't go out and have fun, it means owning the fact that your choices mark you as being different.
I am not white (Anglo-Saxon), but I might as well be. I have a sense of rhythm and am flexible and in decent shape, but I also have aversion to attention for both related and unrelated reasons.
Every time dancing comes up, even "white" dancing like line dancing, I avoid it when I can get away with it, because "white men can't dance".
What do?
I've been there. It's even worse when you get the fake sympathy after you had to get fake mad at their insistence.
Wherever there’s dancing at a wedding or something I just think of it as something I have to get through so I don’t appear rude.
Please note that I am NOT making a moral judgement whether or not you should always act in a pro-social way.
Respect people's choices. Let people be adults who have the right to choose.
I mean, I would say this is trivially true?
> You don't have to do them, but yes, you will be judged for not participating.
Why do you deserve to be judged for not dancing, but not for something like joining an 8 player Mario Kart race?