Show HN: AutoGlance is the Hipmunk for Used Car Searches
autoglance.com
autoglance.com
- The lineup and grouping by price, sort order and "worse deals" are all done right. This is a pretty big deal. Congratulations.
- The "generations" are excellent data to have. Great value for the user.
- It would be nice to know that there is a real picture awaiting my rollover or at least a disclaimer on stock photos if that's possible.
- It's not clear that I should click on the car for more information. I wanted at first to click on the bluish price on the rollover. Maybe just put a little "click car for details" at the bottom of the rollover window.
- Rounder mileage levels would really help. If there were tick marks on each row for 25K increments, that would be the most help.
- It would of course be nice to refine the search.
- Sluggish like crazy at the moment, which I understand.
[EDIT] The more variables you add the more accurate your model can be. You could even use NLP to extract the narrative about the car. You would disrupt KBB, by providing more user friendly interface. It does not have to be the visuals but just the fact that you can boil down the number of all cars that sell down to a hand full number of cars that deviate from the fitted curve. Even if you are not able to tell whether the deviation makes it a good or a bad deal, you are selecting a smaller number of cars worth looking at than any other website. At least you build a time sever which is worth money, too.
[EDIT2] I think I had an epiphany. The distance from the fitted curve is a buyer's risk. Someone comes to your website and you ask what car and what risk. Some people don't want a good deal, they want a fair deal; they want a car that is priced just right. Others might venture to get cars that are outliers, maybe those car have an engine modification or someone is in a rush to sell. In any case you would have a criteria for searching cars that no one has. KBB gives you the sound and fair deal prices but yours index could be calculated in near-real-time and thus more accurate. All depends how you implement regression model.
Note to self: excellent data mining application with interesting visualization
And unfortunately, the direction of the deviation doesn't tell you which, because some percentage of those deviating cars will have hidden issues that more than make up for the price difference.
A killer disruption would be if every car seller was rated on customer satisfaction based on the 12 months of car ownership following the sale.
Feature Requests:
- The ability to search for sub car models (Subaru Forester XT vs Subaru Forester), it looks like some higher end models might be filtered as worse deals at the moment.
- It would also be nice to have a free text field to search for other misc specific car features in the listings.
In this case, I don't know what Hipmunk is...
I've been using autotempest.com to search across several sources but it is like rocks to a hammer when you compare the UI.
For rare makes (Triumph, Fiat, Delorean) I would like the ability to search only by make and for much larger radii. The only Fiat showing is the new 500, but there are plenty of older models available across the country.
Having attempted the creation of a number of flight search products I am sympathetic how hard it is to get this sort of data - you either pay lots of money for it or you screen-scrape. Ick.
But, overall, awesome!
My suggestion would be the ability to add a simple tag next to each vehicle. I could then scan the vehicles and mark which ones are off the list or I should follow up on.
Lastly, I feel like a lot of cars (at least in the price range I'm looking) are sold on craigslist, which isn't used as a source here, for good reason I'm sure.
As for sources, we are definitely going to expand a lot; we felt that what we have now was sufficient for launching.
The main roadblock is not the UI, but the car data source. It looks like he is parsing other sites, and displaying their data. This is illegal for most sites, unless he uses their API or has a deal with them.
...sorry if there's a faq, still offline