Vancouver hospital patient loses Netflix access due to password crackdown
bc.ctvnews.ca
bc.ctvnews.ca
Alan Bennett in Dinner at Noon wrote “Every family has a secret, and the secret is that it's not like other families”[1]. This policy makes no allowances for anything but the most vanilla arrangements.
Homes where the parents separate, so the kids spend time at each parent? Wow, sucks that your parents got divorced now also no netflix for you!
What about people who spend long periods on contract working etc - Oh you have to be on an oil rig/cruise ship/construction site/etc for a few months? Boring as all hell to be away from home and also either you or your family have to do without netflix.
Have a health problem and have to spend time in hospital? At least you have netflix to console you… just kidding, no you don’t!
Etc etc etc
Netflix monetized the long tail of people and now are trying to enforce a policy that only works for people who lead super-generic lives.
It reminds me of a bunch of articles recently that were like "Pregnant mom laid off from company!" I mean, when a company lays off thousands of people, of course you'd expect there to be at least one pregnant woman in the mix. Or was the article somehow arguing pregnant women should be immune from layoffs?
To be clear, I'm not commenting one way or another on the wisdom (or lack thereof) of Netflix's new password sharing policy. Just saying that finding these types of cases doesn't make me change my opinion one way or the other in how I think about the issue.
I don't consider being in the hospital wanting to watch Netflix to actually be that much of an outlier. It's pretty common and I know for certain that I'd want to do it (along with many many others) if I were in that situation.
Tell them too early and you risk discrimination, tell them too late and you risk missing out on legal protection.
Germany is very unfavourable for (young) childless professionals. We see a massive brain drain of highly educated Germans to Switzerland.
That's the same way of looking at it.
> Germany cares about its population enough to want to try to protect people in multiple ways rather than with a single point of failure.
Indeed, you're getting to the root cause of why the hallmark of government enterprise is incompetence, corruption, and inefficiency.
It's a feature, not a bug.
Conversely, I watch YouTube all the time and somehow have not spent the money to get rid of ads.
The other service I pay for is Britbox - good value.
For movies, I just order the DVD from eBay - it costs or 4 bucks and arrives in a day or two.
Also this made me wonder how many people on HN don't actively use an ad blocker. Is there a reason why you don't use one?
I pay for OK Google mainly so it will play Youtube library music tracks. It also includes no ads and some sort of payment for content creators.
I’d rather pay.
I cancelled Netflix as soon as that password sharing stuff was announced even though they backpedalled in most countries. So I’ve been thinking about getting YouTube Premium. The offline feature would actually be quite useful to me as I’m often without signal.
But it shows only IMDB ratings; that is good, but I was hoping for both IMDB & Rotten Tomatoes.
Seems alot. Just canceled last week
And here are some other plans which support multiple people:
- HBO Max is $16
- Hulu, Disney+, and ESPN+ together is $20
- Netflix is $16
- Amazon Prime (huge list of benefits) is $15
This is the main reason I don’t have it. As streaming / bundle services go, its value add is pretty small. If it included cloud storage, maybe. I don’t get how google one doesn’t include it.
Why is it too much? It's a scenario I personally hadn't considered about the password sharing crackdown (I don't travel a ton, so the 7-day window seems...aggravating, but not something that would be a huge issue for me; although I write this I'm realizing I'm in the middle of unanticipated travel that would run afoul of their rules).
Being hospitalized is a scenario in which I would absolutely want to have digital entertainment (obviously, depending on the reason I'm hospitalized). If I paid for Netflix, and got locked out when I needed it the most I would be absolutely livid.
I think, as a customer, it's helpful to know the scenarios that Netflix will kick me to the curb. I hadn't thought about this specific scenario, but it seems hugely problematic to me.
Honestly, this article (and realizing that my current trip would also be disallowed by their rules) makes me realize than when Netflix brings these rules to the US, I'm just going to cancel my subscription, and make sure I have better alternative arrangements when for when I may want them.
It’s kind of like relying on AWS support to waive charges for accidental billing. It’s great that they often do it, but it’s not something I want to rely on. If I make a mistake and need it, I’ll definitely reach out and ask, but… I want to avoid needing to ask.
Here, I’m going to make my purchase decision based on their policies, and the impact of those policies. If I decide to pay for Netflix, and support provides a better experience than I was planning on that’s great.
* Are 'edge cases' < 1% or are they ~ 20% (say) of usage.
* Is there a significant downside to ignoring the tricky stuff.
etc.
Sounds like Netflix needs a "Falsehoods programmers believe about families" list.
Trying to shove societal concepts into SQL tables never ends well.
These are not decisions by programers. These are business decisions.
They are trying to find a way to part as many people with as much money as possible but not more. If they err in one direction they leave money on the table, if they err in the other direction they start losing subscribers.
a german public tv license is per household too and would not include the hospital patient either. and of course, they get plenty of complaints about edgecases as well.
if netflix wanted to sell to families, they could do that by somehow letting you specify who the familymember is, and how they relate to you and limiting it to a number of people.
Else they should just be ignoring password sharing as a concern altogether rather than causing negative press.
It’s always an interesting moment when a company stalls out on organic growth and decides its strategy should be to start to blackmail existing customers and try to grow revenue that way. This is how you get to a situation where enterprise IT leaders live in fear of being audited by Oracle and actively seek to replace what was once a key part of their IT strategy just because the vendor is so aggressive about leaping on any license infringement however unintentional.
[1] https://variety.com/2022/digital/news/netflix-sharing-passwo...
[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/250934/quarterly-number-...
[3] https://www.nme.com/news/tv/netflix-ridiculed-over-resurface...
To be honest I probably wouldn’t trust people not to mess my recommendations up!
I thought there were user profiles inside the account specifically so different people don't trample each other like that?
if a hospital transplant patient recognizes that and subscribes, then I'm buying calls
because otherwise, this is not news