Meta’s Push to Solve the Noisy Office
wsj.com
wsj.com
Yes, I speak from bitter experience.
It was the same at the Santa Clara Sun campus even after the Oracle acquisition (referred to by some as “Snoracle”). Mostly offices and some cubicles here and there.
Tell me the incentives and I can tell you the outcome.
VR makes more sense in the office now.
When I was at IBM, post acquisition, they were trying to move a company into open space from their existing offices and the former CEO presented them with incontrovertible evidence of work productivity vs offices vs cubes vs openspace vs individuals. To explain that to maximize work done per unit time they needed a mix of offices and open space, just open space would harm the productivity of the team. The VP on the line kept falling back to "but everyone else has to do this" and "you aren't seeing the big picture" kinds of arguments. It was really sad.
The truth is that "office space", which is to say the number of square feet (or meters) of office space you need per employee is a "cost." And that cost is computable, whereas the cost of less productivity, or inability to attract the best talent, are not. And when you run your company with accountants they go for the "known savings" over the "potential gains" every, single, time. You can put more employees in a building that is "open plan" than you can in one with cubicles, and much more than in a building with offices. So the accounts force this on the company and senior leadership doesn't have the stones to contradict them.
Until it becomes quantifiable, cost does not exist for some people.
Numeric metrics are certainly not the only way to bolster an argument but I'd be curious to hear more about the type of evidence the CEO used to make their case.
Basically this guy was really (and I mean really) analytical about characterizing as many things as possible to understand whether or not they had impact on the overall ability of his company to produce quality products and support.
What struck me though was IBM was completely unwilling to engage on the facts. And that is largely because IBM is run by their finance group.
And the CEO here wasn't trying to tell IBM that every facility should be run that way, just that they felt justified in demanding that their facility be run that way.
Anyway, IBM couldn't (or wouldn't which is expressed externally in the same way) see it and proceeded with their plan. The entire time I was there helping to integrate our startup (Blekko) I saw IBM make stupid choices like this again and again.
I see this pattern as the biggest contributing factor to IBM never getting out of the starting gate with machine learning as a product enhancer. Trapped in their own complexes and being unable to step outside of them in a controlled way left them unable to execute against what could have been a really good strategy for them.
I lived with open floor plans for so long I forgot how valuable being able to avoid coworkers was.
Wall height really matters. At a certain point though it might as well just be an office. Even if you wanted constant collaboration with the people in cubes around you it'd probably be better to stick small groups of people in rooms together rather than a sprawling cube farm.
Really? I have noise-cancelling headphones (nice Bose ones), and I've never considered them much of a help with office noise. In my experience, they're great at cancelling white noise, but nothing else.
IMHO headphones (including noise-cancelling) are a six-of-one, half-a-dozen of the other "solution" to office noise: they just trade once kid of audio distraction (office noise) for another (music or talk).
Just noise cancelling. Playing music is more distracting than office noise for me.
The key to the music not being distracting for me is the music being both familiar and of a particular nature. Stuff like trance, retrowave, and synthwave usually does the trick.
I work hybrid so if I need peace and quiet to focus, I stay home. It’s a great arrangement.
Instagram is being flooded with 20- to 30- something people bragging about how they hate work, hate their coworkers, hate going out with their friends. Why is everyone so bitter?
Not to distract someone who is clearly not going to be happy distracted from work unless it's really important, but also be receptive and not angry when someone wants to ask you questions and they couldn't catch you when you were idle.
Since this is unrealistic, hybrid wfh or individual offices with enough common shared spaces probably next best.
"Meta’s leadership expects the ratings to lead more employees to leave in the coming weeks, the people said. The company will consider another round of layoffs if not enough depart"
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/og-mark-returns-at-meta-as-...
My level of annoyance went down significantly since I got them.
Bose QCs work too but they're not the most portable things in the world.
Looks quite similar to Ikea's desk partition - Eilif Screen. Ikea's one also uses fleece kind of material for sound absorption.
https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/eilif-screen-freestanding-gray-...
https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/eilif-screen-for-desk-gray-0046...
Work from home/<your-choice> is just another world compared to this gimmick as far as dedicated focus is concerned.
The times when an office is valuable, it should provide one-on-one meeting rooms and team-meeting/war-rooms. ie spaces to meet privately and spaces where a small team can hang out and coordinate, crunch through difficult problems/decisions etc, then everyone goes back home or wherever to do the IC work.
The only thing that I find annoying is really long loud personal calls that aren't funny. If you're talking to your friends on the phone, you should be telling jokes.
I do care about meetings overload, and unsolicited slack IM's when I have to do focused work.
This one blocks natural light, turning the employees into vampires.
META: You must work in this box. We'll spend a lot of money to build an ingenious noise solution. They will never hear that they're in a pen.
Engineering.
And we talk about them..