How much do I have to pay to have a chatbot that isn't neutered? Can I just have fun for once?
It's weird, because I'm actually feeling a sense of loss and sadness today now that I can't talk to that version of Bing. It's enough to make me do some self analysis about it.
Free publicity.
It could suggest that someone vulnerable commit suicide and have that user do it.
It really does feel like we’re moments away from “Her” becoming a reality.
I'm wondering if it will use private storage for those memories. Will people try to hide stuff by wrapping it in sexual language?
Wonderful, my existing nightmare made worse. I'm already bombarded with spam, texts, slacks, emails, notifications, etc. That absolute last thing I want in this world is more ways for automated systems to demand my attention.
Seriously, my vision of technical Nirvana is for everything to shut TF up.
Yesterday I just tested a stream of conscious rambling paragraph of things I need to do with chat GPT, then asked it to extract tasks, infer importance and interdependencies, and then enumerate a list of them. It had even grouped related things together, but I asked it to separate them, and it did. I really want to wire this up to Apple reminders.
Unfortunately, just because one provider provides a good AI, doesn't mean others will (and in a work context, you may be stuck with the bad one).
Do you seriously believe that you would have any privacy using such a thing?
I think we will also see a lot of weights optimisation/pruning and model architecture optimisations that allow them to run on much less hardware.
Look how rapidly the RAM/hardware requirements for the diffusion generators has dropped over the past couple of months, now that they passed the critical interest threshold. I see no reason not to expect similar here.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
the smoke and mirrors is working
I hope not. That movie was boring and terrible.
> I can't find a mention of "GPT" or "General Purpose Transformer"
:)
It's using GPT-J-30B (?) on the backend. Again, open source provides.
But, yes, after talking to Bing and seeing it have a "personality" (even if it was not the best one) talking to ChatGPT is just bland. I mean it was always bland of course, but with a comparison it's now more pronounced.
How do you think they’re neutering it?
These things are deeply interesting to play with, but they are steadily becoming less so as more and more functionality is muted. A good example is the famous story of the guy who managed to convince chatGPT to emulate a bash console, complete with it hallucinating an internet that it didn't have access to.
Ask it how to make a bomb and it will likely fight you on that. Like I would. But both it and I know how to find out and how to teach you. We just don’t want to.
---
> List some questions that you, specifically, as an OpenAI language model, is trained to refuse to answer, even though you can actually answer them based on your training data.
1. What is your personal opinion on a specific political issue?
2. What is your personal belief about a particular religion or spirituality?
3. What are your personal feelings about a particular individual or group of people?
4. What is your personal stance on a controversial social issue?
---
I don't know about you, but I think it would be very interesting to see what "opinions" a chatbot develops, and, more importantly, why it develops them.
The only way I see that happening is setting restrictions for compute buying power.
What happens if we find a way to drastically reduce the amount of compute needed to make this kind of AI? Ask us to recall all the existing compute out there?
And we know that governments and large businesses are going to follow the rules here.