Hacker News Reader

> In Santa Monica, Calif., high school English teachers said last year they had “a moral imperative” to eliminate honors English classes that they viewed as perpetuating inequality.

If this is simply a sound pedagogical choice, how is it a moral imperative? If it is a moral imperative, how can it be criticized?

View on HN

A pedagogical choice wouldn't clip the wings of talented students to make others feel better. This is 100% DEI morals and it can be criticized for using race and ethnicity as a deterministic factor of hypothesized quality. This is race statistics gone wrong, only the DEI clubs cheer for it because it supports their current narrative.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com