Hacker News Reader

Comment by kelnos | Hacker News Reader

Yeah, my feeling here was that it's sort of tautological: if GPT predicts "a", then it must then predict a word that would follow "a" and not require "an" (and vice versa). And if you think about it from the opposite direction: if it's working out a response that is eventually going to have "apple" in it, then all the data it's trained on is going to cause it to predict "an" even before it needs to predict "apple".

(Admittedly, all this ML/AI stuff is still beyond my current level of understanding, so I'm sure my thinking here is off.)

View on HN

I think that's essentially right - if it's already "thinking about" apples, then ' an' will be significantly upregulated at the expense of ' a', then if it does choose to output an ' an' token, ' apple' becomes a highly likely followup.

You could probably test this by seeing if prompts containing a lot of nouns that start with a vowel sound results in output that contains a higher proportion of otherwise unrelated first-vowel nouns. (ie your prompt includes lots of apples, apricots, avocados, asparagus, aubergines, elderberries, eggplants, endives, oranges, olives, okras, onions and you count the proportion of non-food nouns in the result that start with a vowel and non-vowel sound).

The main issue is that GPT is fundamentally an autoregressive language model — it's only predicting the next token based on the prompt at a single time. Every time it wants to predict the next word, it adds the previously predicted word into the prompt, repeating the cycle. We can intuitively guess that the model is 'working out a response that is eventually going to have "apple" in it', but we don't actually know how the model 'thinks' ahead about its response.

To rephrase that for this case: what is the specific mechanism in GPT-2 that (1) makes it realise that the word 'apple' is significant in this prompt, and (2) use that knowledge to push the model to predict 'an'? Finding this neuron would only answer the some portion of (2).

(And to rephrase this for the general case, which gives us the initial question: How does GPT-2 know when, given a suitable context, to predict 'an' over 'a'?)

Do an improv exercise with a friend. Construct a story about a sentient apple one word at a time. I guarantee you that at one point one of you will set up the other with an “an” in your story. This is how I believe this works.

Your friend is thinking ahead that the next word would be apple When they say ‘an’.

But GPT can’t think ahead what token it will add after the one it is on. Or can it? It could “predict” internally the word apple for the next “meaningful” word and output ‘an’ because of this.

Or it could keep outputting articles where appropriate until it outputs an “an” and then output apple having teed itself up.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com