Isn't this exactly what you're trying to do here?
> Free speech isn't just about saying anything you want, it's also about maximizing the number of voices at the table
Free speech is "about" whatever is in the first amendment
> it's also about maximizing the number of voices at the table
Ahh yes, because the people who try to redefine "free speech" like what you're doing are definitely well known for promoting this /s
It is very odd to assert that the morality of speech is completely, correctly, and undeniably established in a document written 250 years ago that defines the laws of only one country.
Where are you getting this morality business from?
Free speech is how it's defined in law, in the USA that's the 1st
Talking about "morality of speech" is just noise and deserves the quotation marks
Why the fuck do I care what the laws in Australia are when I don't live in Australia. you should see how govts interpret the "morality" or "offending" clauses in nation-states like India and Egypt to give themselves more power and arrest dissidents.
Lol, USAian moment, how about the other 7.7 billion of us?