The israelis destabilizing democracy and disrupting elections worldwide
haaretz.com
haaretz.com
I remember a professor at my university about whom a fake website claiming he sexually harassed a student was created. Of course the claims were false but because he was an advisor for the Palestine club his name was dragged through mud.
Since a previous comment chain with sources has disappeared for some reason, I’ve posted sources for further reading here:
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2017/1/11/exclusive-israe...
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210602-bbc-sparks-outrag...
Also see the US anti-boycott laws:
https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2018/07/take-action-stop...
https://www.salon.com/2022/02/02/anti-bds-law-in-texas-free-...
https://theintercept.com/2018/11/22/israel-boycott-canary-mi...
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2018-10-04/ty-article/.p...
As for the apartheid analogy, there's some truth to it and also many differences from what happened in South Africa. The big elephant in the room is that no Palestinian leadership, ever, in the last 100 years actually accepted Zionism / a Jewish state in any kind of borders. And many kinds of partitions were discussed throughout history. So settlements or no settlements we are left with a security control / martial law that Israel will have to keep over the Palestinians for its survival as long as this continues since the denial of Zionism is often violent. Is that apartheid? Not in my eyes no. But the settlements are (and are very controversial within Israel btw, and some of them were dismantled). Is this reason enough for anyone who identifies as a Zionist to be attacked/harassed automatically without even hearing what he has to say? For you it seems like it is. Shouldn't then Americans be spat at as soon as they open their mouths over what happened in Iraq? I mean some people say Americans murdered one million people for no good reason why does this get a pass? The Israeli Palestinian conflict is peanuts compared to some of the adventures the U.S had and Israel at least has a good reason to fight, what's the U.S excuse? Yet its beyond the pale for Americans to be boycotted/harassed simply for being Americans - not now and not when the war was going on.
The situation in Israel is tragic and complex and needs real solutions, but the anti Zionist crowd that sees everything as good or evil (Israel of course is evil, the Palestinians good) has it all figured out.
Israel is, and will always be, internationally on the nose for what happened in that region and after the war. Even to people like me who are sympathetic to the historical persecution, brute forcing yourself onto a land you feel your people have a spiritual connection to and forming an ethnic state is regrettable.
I love Jewish people. I've met lots of amazing Israelis and understand the a fair bit about issues, but settling in that region was fucking silly and always going to yield this unending conflict and the dismay of the world.
Anyway, I don't have the inclination to engage in heated online discussions. I may read if you reply but will not respond.
Really? That's surprising actually. Have a good one!
This article is a really interesting, detailed piece on what I suspect many have suspected.
It could be russia, it could be china...but the goal is to destabilize the US
My comment was mostly about voting outcomes and not other types of disruption. Following the prior example, the vast majority of people dug into the side they already supported and didn't really affect party choice.
In case you missed it there was a recent paper on this topic:
>Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35576-9
Summary thread: https://twitter.com/CSMaP_NYU/status/1612449687218397194
You can find it here (Sorry, large zip files, but straight from the source):
https://democrats-intelligence.house.gov/social-media-conten...
A lot of this is related to reflexive control theory applied to psyops where you are conditioning a target to respond with anger (negative emotions work best, but any emotional response is valid). The goal being to divide groups and prevent them from establishing a constructive dialogue between themselves and by eliciting predictable (again, often negative) responses to certain stimuli. This allows a malign actor to effectively paralyze a governing body by preventing the two sides from working together to accomplish even the most basic of goals. It's often used in concert with other forms of subversion such as political/legal manipulation and warfare to achieve the desired outcome.
RAND and CSIS have a number of good reports and articles on this type of thing if you wish to know more.
This is not really news in India because you have the current ruling party involved with
https://www.bingedaily.in/article/here-s-how-the-bjp-it-cell...
https://thewire.in/tekfog/en/1.html
And this isn't even some secret, it is in the open. Everyone knows it
I know of some farm operators too and this tracks.
Theyll equally do campaigns for or against NGOs, and any political party anywhere. Getting those contracts are lucrative but the crypto ones are faster.
Like I would say them approaching a crypto project is top of the funnel. And then as customer relationship they also know everyone is in a country they want to influence.
how do you think they managed to plant all these military bases all around the world?
There's also comments from one of the team that seems to indicate that they aren't involved in such shenanigans locally, but they're not pretending it isn't happening. He still votes because he has "faith".
> Timed action: When needed, the operator has an army of avatars which can be configured and timed. Thus a huge group is created, who can echo the negative message on all networks
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-troll...
There are literally hundreds of articles about Shareblue and their army of avatars. Not fake news. Very proven.