> When I see an account in my feed that subscribes to Twitter Blue, I block it without even looking at the content of the tweet(s).
I can’t follow this line of thinking. I risk saying it’s juvenile.
I can’t follow this line of thinking. I risk saying it’s juvenile.
I am not saying that all content from Twitter Blue accounts is bad (I am sure a lot of it is very good), but that I - on average - will get better content in my feed from not having any Twitter Blue accounts showing up.
Do you feel this is juvenile? If not, can you clearly differentiate? Just to be clear, we're talking about blocking people that artificially boost their reach. In my view, these boosted messages will at best bring you "worse" content (in the sense that it isn't visible due to the content of the message, but due to the wallet of the author), at worst you'll get content from malicious actors (state actors etc.) washed to look like grass-roots opinions.
I don't see how using tools to make a user experience better for myself is juvenile.