In the US it’s socialized risk / privatized gain. It’s interesting to see the flip side happen in an autocratic regime - privatized risk / socialized gain. Ultimately in this case the government is actually at fault but it puts private parties heads on a spike for taking advantage of the incentives the government provided while ethical parties were pushed out as they couldn’t remain economically viable.
How does this tie into all the building code amnesty rulings the government supported the last few years there? I feel horrible for the people there.
When I see a conviction I'll be satisfied. You can arrest pretty much anybody.
Can someone help me read the whole article without subscribing? I dont hate the subscription model, there should be a limit on what to paywall.