Ford set to announce $3.5B EV battery plant in Marshall, sources say

There is a slight of hand going on there. Corporations bankrolled Chinese businessmen and their silent Communist party partners to build factories in China. Which they then outsourced production to.

When foreign EV battery makers entered China back in 2015, China's domestic EV manufacturing was still tiny. LG Chem from South Korea was among the first to open EV battery plant in Nanjing, China in the late 2015, and China quickly greeted them with a change in EV/EV battery subsidy policies that excluded foreign competitors and in some cases, China refused to grant license to do business there; all in the name of protecting their EV battery younglings. And it seems to have worked: CATL and BYD from China are now among the biggest producers of EV batteries today.

I'm not sure if Ford/CATL's new plant is necessarily going to "revitalize/re-industrialize" American manufacturing, but my fear is that China has no compunction about weaponizing their dominant market position or trade to settle geopolitical disputes (eg, rare earth metal export restriction against Japan in 2010).

It seems like you'd create a new user account, then transfer the comments and submissions from the old one to the new one, then close the old one. But it's still impressive you're able to keep Firebase, Algolia, and HN in sync while doing that atomically.

Though I guess you'd need to solve that problem anyway, in order to move hundreds of comments from one thread to another. I'm not sure how you talk to Firebase and Algolia from Arc -- I used curl, and issuing thousands of curl requests tended to take awhile to complete. https://github.com/tensorfork/tlarc/blob/master/algolia.arc#...

Hopefully some of the Arc enhancements can be released someday. But in the meantime, thanks for implementing features that you really didn't need to implement. Users would've survived if they couldn't change their names, but now they can, and that's pretty special. Have a good evening.

This "Mega Site" has been on the table now for almost 15 years.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen-alabama-idUSL0...

If I remember correctly, the Alabama site had utilities on site ready to go and our site was three contiguous farms.

Fifteen years later that's still mostly the case but there are fewer houses among the farms and various levels of government have been making actual property purchases to increase their commitment to the idea of an industrial site.

It wasn't until they started clear cutting all the trees along C Drive North that local opposition assembled around a "save historic Marshall" message. Even though there's been a decade and a half to derail this project.

Also, we're not just on the I-94 corridor, but we're also on the I-69 corridor. The site is also within spitting distance of a rail line (I don't remember if its the CN Grand Trunk line or BNSF).