Hacker News Reader

Comment by goodpoint | Hacker News Reader

Ideally you should not be seeing k8s at all in mission critical infrastructure in any tech company. I know few FAANGs that stay away from it.

View on HN

I disagree with that. Many fortune 500s are running k8s to power critical infra. GMF processes all OnStar data in realtime on k8s, GitHub runs entirely on k8s, etc etc. You need the personal and the tools to manage it, but at a certain point k8s makes sense. There are still use cases were k8s is not a solution.

EDIT: part of actions, codespaces and packages are not run on k8s, but 80% of github services are

> GitHub runs entirely on k8s

That's really not the endorsement you think it is.

Your comment doesn't really help understand why.

GitHub experiences outages pretty regularly, for example on 12 separate days last month: https://www.githubstatus.com/history

So what? Nothing here is sufficient to conclude it has anything to do with k8 whatsoever.

For example “users cannot resume code spaces created before the incident” sounds a lot more like an application level problem.

The point above was that it wasn't a good endorsement. Correlation is not causation but the opposite is also true.

Why? Yes the operations can be a bit messy. But in practice it solves the "I want to run, update and deploy my service without worrying about hardware allocations" problem. Otherwise you create an implementation of half of it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com