A Reddit user fact-checked and found that the Bing bot was still hallucinating

They missed one.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31796677/

> Therefore, we conducted a proof-of-concept study that randomized 70 amnestic MCI patients to a 1-year program of AET or a non-aerobic stretching and toning (SAT), active control group. Thirty-six patients completed both baseline and follow-up MRI scans, and cerebral WM integrity was measured by WM lesion volume and diffusion characteristics using fluid-attenuated-inversion-recovery and diffusion tensor imaging respectively.

WM lesions/integrity aren't the same thing as amyloid levels, though it looks like a bunch of studies have looked at them together and have found relationships. I'm sure they appear together in the same text a lot.

I think that might be one conflation. It also got the journal wrong, and I don't see Cooper Inst. referenced in the affiliations section (though I'm not sure what form that would take).

But I'm pretty sure that's the 70 person study being referenced, unless it was another that was run just like it. Worth noting also that 36/70 (the final group size) is just shy of 52%. I think that might be why it was "52 weeks" and not "one year" for the program.

I believe that's medicalspeak for the 6th and 7th bullet points in the Bing summary. I'm not sure if the full article would reflect the rest.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22Texas%20Southwester...

For me, it's result #114.

The AI calling people rude and aggressive sure will be popular when going mass market and replacing search for my grandmother!