Digital Equipment answers a user's complaint that the year 2000 should not be a leap year.
www-users.cs.york.ac.uk
www-users.cs.york.ac.uk
The writer proved remarkably prescient but,alas, Digital Equipment Corporation was not there to greet the new millennium.
Or even to (February) 2000.
Oh boy. I knew that day the Alpha was doomed. Pitty... Such a promising achitecture.
Well... Back to my x86... I have work to do.
Finally, the Alpha technology was sold off to Intel. The advantages of the architecture (and some of the engineers involved) have been assimilated into the CPU borg. It may be ugly, due to such a long and sordid history, but the x86 architecture is now wicked fast. Also the Alpha had elephantine power and cooling requirements. My last company once attended an event where we setup our boxes side by side with a competitors Alpha-based systems, and they had discreetly placed a box fan behind their biggest unit, because, without it, the ambient temperature of the room was too high for the Alpha box to operate reliably. Their box was much faster than ours though. I asked if they included a box fan, or if that cost extra.
But don't let me stand in the way of nostalgia. I, too, remember staring in awe at a DEC that was running at 400MHz, when the Intel architectures were still stumbling along at 166, or something along those lines (and with a dramatically slower bus, and only dual CPU capability in the Pentium Pro).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year#Algorithm
I knew about the 100, didn't realize the 400 though until I looked into it. The response is comical, but you can understand where the user got confused.
Does anyone else think its interesting that throughout history there have been numerous... "this isn't working for me, lets just skip some days and it'll be okay!" Heck, this may not even really be there year 2008.
Isn't something wrong here?
Er, is that right?
The year 1582 didn't have Oct. 5th through Oct. 14th (inclusive). They just skipped from the fourth of October to the fifteenth!