It's better to think of RAW as pure data, just like infrared telescope capture data needs transformation to be displayed on a screen.
Displaying raw as-is means clipping the data to some range, which is a transformation in itself (and a pretty bad one).
The TL;DR is that "raw footage" is sort of meaningless with video. You could make the comparison look as good or bad as you want.
If you want to continue to be obtuse, you can use the same colorspace/LUT that any generic phone camera is tuned to.
It doesn't sound that deep nor that well reasoned of an opinion. For that reason, I won't try your software nor will I recommend it to anyone.
That's not how it works lmao
Pretending image mastering and color correction is incomprehensible doesn't make it so.