Something strange is happening on the sun, and we've never seen it before
vice.com
vice.com
A polar vortex formed in the north. video:
https://twitter.com/TamithaSkov/status/1621276153075109888?s...
2001 is really a visual opera so to speak, but it makes very little sense without the book/("programme"?). I felt like this was written after the movie.
2010 felt like much more of a read that was written before the movie with a deliberate plot.
Applies to most media, really.
Also the cognitive dissonance of people here when their favorite platform gets compared to admittedly lower quality ones (Reddit). What should one expect however when the front page is for the most part infested with meaningless platitudes about trends that end up being short-lived but get hyped as life-altering innovations?
And I haven’t even touched upon the subject of the course of debates on the site (bold assumptions by commenters significantly lacking background but still considering themselves authority)…
How has this anything to do with the JWST? That telescope would be ruined instantly if it were pointed at the Sun.
The find by SDO extends a series of interesting space observations started by JWST.
But that would be a somewhat weird point to make, so I would agree, they probably thought the observation was by JWST.
..article was written by Bard??
Edit: Sorry; tried to edit this before the post went live but the site crashed for me for several minutes. I meant to specify that we were blaming their language model. There's certainly plenty of an argument to be made that Google is partly responsible for the current state of SEO and all that garbage going in.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/54493401-project-hail-ma...
I had to read the small passage through a couple of times to make sure I had the right context.
Also read, and loved, and had emotional reactions to Project Hail Mary. Highly recommend.
The big revelation about how he got there also felt nearly translucent in how obvious it was when it was revealed.
I hope he writes a couple more books though, if I can ever get some grandkids outta my kids, Weir’s books will be in their collection for sure.
I think he wrote himself into a tight spot though, and I’m happy with the result. Part of me thinks the second act could’ve been broken down into maybe like 0-1000, 1000-5000, and then the final act could’ve been essentially as it was, stripped down a bit. It felt to me like he crammed a little too much worldbuilding into it and couldn’t draw on the resourcefulness and resilience of humanity that dominates the first act. But it makes sense in context, because they’re not in such dire straits in the second half, and are approaching the whole issue from complex standpoints of religion and meaning and societal archetypes.
I surely couldn’t have done better, I know that much.
Anathem is another one of these novels.
But yes, the difference is not huge.
https://www.randomhousebooks.com/books/611060/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Hail_Mary
https://bookshop.org/p/books/project-hail-mary-andy-weir/186...
But I just Googled it, and someone on Reddit pointed out: "Hail Mary full of Grace."
Groan... Actually makes me like the book a little less than I already did. (Edit: Which I know is against the grain here, as evidenced by the downvotes for not liking the book.)
Also, the prayer referenced in this idiom starts off as "Hail Mary, full of grace" and the main character's name is Grace.
edit: beaten by 6 min.
A drone with a gun would get thrown about as it shoots.
Missiles, lasers, EMP, and explosives seem like the most practical drone weapons.
- String a wire between two drones - Stick a spear to the front - Have it drop acid - Have it lift then drop the monster - Have it lift and drop a stone on the monster - Build in crossbow/ballistae etc etc....
Read the book a while ago, didn't realize it was being made into a movie until recently, maybe others are unaware too. I'm eagerly optimistic :)
Also I believe there's a movie in the works for Project Hail Mary. Just finished the book and am hoping the film will be as good.
The story is very good, but it was also interesting to read the Chinese point of view.
Presumably we've only been observing the sun for a few hundred years at most, and maybe less than a hundred and fifty with any level of precise accuracy and scientific rigour. That's maybe 30 cycles in total, and 12 or 13 where we'd really be able to tell what's happening. If you bring probes or telescopes that can look at the sun into the mix we've observed maybe 4 or 5 cycles.
The notion that something is extraordinary because we haven't seen it before is ridiculous. The sun probably does thousands of things we haven't observed yet. That doesn't make it weird or strange. That just means we've only been a scientifically literate species for an incredibly short time.
It's not necessarily strange in the scope of the sun's entire existence, but it's definitely strange to us.
However, sharing the joy of "we haven't seen this before, we don't know what it means," and speaking of incorrect and frankly even silly possible interpretations is how we collectively, eventually, understand these things. The process is chaotic and often ugly but works well enough that humans think they're more in control of this planet than the ants are.
Be careful that the justified ire against the authoritative tone of some dipshit reporter doesn't blind you to the wonder of new discovery.
I'm anticipating the "aliens are drinking the sun like a milkshake," theorists to have a field day with this one. I'll read their discussions for amusement and the possibility they might turn up details or implications no one else does, cuz no one else looks at the data the way they do.
If that's the case, we should be studying the straw. If they have a straw that reaches all the way to our star, then they have all the star. So just think about the tech we could learn by just studying that straw
Here is one of the more out there theories I found.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0410/0410569.pdf
The fractional percent crowd bases their theory on the observed spectrum of the sun. the large iron core side bases their theory on the observed distribution of iron in the inner solar system.
It is interesting because too much iron and there would be no fusion, but think of the iron cores in the planets, the sun coalesced from the same dust, there has to be a large amount in there.
Shout out to: https://spaceweather.com/
"Something strange is happening on the sun, and we've seen it before"
"Something quite normal is happening on the sun, even though we've never seen it before (because we've existed for approx .0021% of the sun's life"
"Something is happening on the sun, and we'll puff up the importance of this measurement anomaly better than any other ad platform"
--- "Sun produces never seen before polar vortex"
And when I ask ChatGPT to write a matter of fact headline for the article it comes up with this:
--- "Sun's North Pole Experiences Unusual Phenomenon as Part of Surface Breaks Off and Forms a Giant Polar Vortex"
When I ask it to make it more sensational we get closer to what we are used to from click hungry media these days
--- "Mystery Unfolds as Sun's North Pole Forms a Giant Polar Vortex, Scientists Baffled by Unprecedented Event"
It may be time to begin flying west