Supabase Clippy – ChatGPT for Supabase Docs
supabase.com
supabase.com
This is a follow up demonstration, adding a "ChatGPT" interface to our own docs. To use it, you can go to https://supabase.com/docs and then type "cmd + /". This will pull up a "Clippy" interface, where you can ask it questions about supabase (sorry in advance to mobile users)
In "Show HN" spirit, it's very hacky/MVP, so I expect it will break. We'd value any feedback.
[0] Storing OpenAI embeddings in Postgres: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34684593
Also special shoutout to pgvector (https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector), which is used to store all of the embeddings.
(It does seem that the ancient https://github.com/eulerto/pg_similarity is supported by RDS and Google Cloud - but it's hard to tell whether attention was paid to its performance characteristics with nearly the rigor that pgvector seems to have been designed.)
"Clippy, create a table called "users" with the fields: first name, last name, bio."
there's been a lot of these bots coming out, and some of the poorly implemented ones are probably going to make this endeavor look bad, and i'm wondering for your thoughts - what Quality Control/testing approach do you think makes sense for an unbounded chat bot like this?
The biggest win for companies like us is that something like this becomes ubiquitous, so that people get bored of prompt-hacking and then just use the tool like they are supposed to. Over time we'll add rate-limiting, caching, and other hardening.
We'd be happy to share some prompts in the future (as long as we can determine that it respect out users' privacy/safety)
Have you tried implementing the same functionality using open-source models?
Email me: arvind@kyberinsurance.com
Is this not an excellent example of an argument that LLMs such as GPT should be able to train on copyright protected works as it constitutes fair use?
And I don't think it is fair use at all, imagine a company like OpenAI train the model on its own internal docs and code, then you'll be able to ask the model to replicate ChatGPT and copilot, or even closed software like Photoshop.
These tools are being released under the assumption that training large-language models will be found as fair use of any copyrighted works.
Are y’all starting to see the arguments for why the model and the outputs of the model are two different issues and that the models themselves, and the products built on top of them, will be considered fair use and that the liability for copyright infringement lays completely with the person using the tool?
I don’t use it myself, but whatever they’re doing looks impressive from the outside.
My keyboard does not have a cmd key, and I am not a mobile user.
I have to do Shift + 7 to get the "/", so maybe that breaks it; also Ctrl/Meta + "/" is already mapped to an OS X function.
What about Ctrl/Meta + Space? I've seen that around.
Also, lol, you release a great thing and the discussion turned out to be around the hotkeys, ha.
Supabase is a great place,
For hosting your database.
It's open source and free,
So you can use it with glee.
It's simple to get started,
No infrastructure to be charted.
It's a hosted platform,
So you can use it with no qualm.