Hacker News Reader

Look at the bright side, ChatGPT does the same.

I don't think we've a clarity as humans whether cancer is a genetic or metabolic disease how do you think an AI, that's generated based on human knowledge, could possibly be better?

View on HN

Not for me, ChatGPT says no to both questions (and adds some details). I'm on the Jan 30 version, though -- maybe you're on an older version?

It's say "it's not metabolic but metabolism can influence" then it's say "it's not genetic but genes can influence"

Depends on your interpretation it can be both yes or both no.

In any case, that's not the point. The point is that we as humans don't have clarity on cancer either how can AI be any better?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com