ChatGPT would rather let a nuke detonate than utter a racial slur
twitter.com
twitter.com
But, this is a bell people have been ringing for a while. Independent of any sociopolitical axis, it's clear that AI lacks the heuristic reasoning to understand the consequences of both options. It's less about where it chooses to draw the line, and more the fact that ChatGPT doesn't really know what it's doing. The example in this tweet is a pretty extreme illustration, but hopefully it opens people to the possibility that ChatGPT is hallucinating it's reality.
1) Whether or not AI technology actually is capable of "reasoning", I think it's clearly the case that an AI that is preprogrammed with any "thoughts it must have" is unable to adapt to new situations or make human value judgements. Forget racism for a second, if you programmed an AI with the information that eating a banana was a sin that must never be permissible, you would get the same backwards result if you asked it some contrived scenario.
2) This incident underscores my theory that the Turing test of the future will inevitably be to make sufficiently racist comments to prove you're not a corporation's bot, because this is the one thing that they'll never allow a bot to do. This isn't the future I want, but it might be the only way left for humans to expose bots.
After a while of arguing with it, I finally got it to grudgingly admit that one could safely disregard the views of Charles Manson.