> create a minimalist future environment that still looks beautiful 25 years later.
See also: Dark City
> create a minimalist future environment that still looks beautiful 25 years later.
See also: Dark City
I must say though that I don't think the opening monologue reveals too much. It reveals something but the city still feels weird, you don't truly understand the strangers' goals at the beginning, and there are still plot twists. If you don't even know about the strangers at the beginning, I wonder how the movie would play... a pity I cannot wipe my own memories and re-experience it ;)
This happened accidentally with Memento [0], it it became an incredible film. Without all that setup in the first scene, you exist with the protagonist as he discovers his world.
I've tried it with other films and they give away too much information, you the viewer are practically handed the whole script.
Give it a shot, you might like doing it that way.
"The Wadsworth Constant is the idea (and 2011 meme) that one can safely skip past the first 30 percent of any YouTube video without missing any important content."
I don't quite think the UI_at_80x24 constant has the same ring to it.
Part of the tension is knowing Leonard is going to kill Teddy, we just don’t know why.
Skipping the first 10 minutes is like skipping the last 10, "I just know where this is going anyway". Nope. So much can happen in 10 minutes! Plus, you know, they filmed that part for a reason.
It's also like skipping the first chapter of a book: sure, some books would be improved by trimming their clumsy beginnings, but good books aren't.
In general, I disagree with your rule of thumb. My favorite movies have cool beginnings, and it'd be a shame to miss them.
The first scene really drew me in to wondering WTF is this movie going to be about?!
The first scene created the mystery. One of my favourite movie openings.
Probably there's also less effort in collecting and making this content available.
Fans almost always say they prefer the DC (or actually the "Final Cut"), but my theory is that their opinion isn't really valid because they all saw the theatrical version first, so upon viewing the later cuts, they had the benefit of already knowing the story and background, and of course they can't just forget that when watching a voiceover-less cut.
So, I've never actually seen the theatrical version with the voiceover. However, I don't believe there's anything in the film that I don't understand. I understood the symbolism and the message that was being conveyed. I'm being deliberately vague here because I don't want to spoil it for any random reader who might see this.
I don't think there's anything particularly difficult to understand about the film. Perhaps you think I am giving people too much credit? I don't think I am. There are lots of films out there with deeper meanings and hidden ideas/messages. There are lots of very critical viewers out there who pay attention and don't need everything spelled out for them. These are also the people most likely to get annoyed when a voiceover spoils it for them.