https://www.amazon.com/Lights-Plant-Indoor-Plants-Spectrum/d...
https://urbanplants.co.in/blogs/news/most-effective-co2-abso...
https://www.amazon.com/Lights-Plant-Indoor-Plants-Spectrum/d...
https://urbanplants.co.in/blogs/news/most-effective-co2-abso...
So, if you've accidentally spiked your CO2 levels up to 2000ppm, one of these bad boys should get you back down to a mere 1000ppm in a tidy 1000 hours or so.... assuming you've evacuated all humans and animals from the house and nullified all other sources of CO2 emission.
There are a lot of great reasons to have indoor plants; just be realistic about their ability to meaningfully impact indoor CO2 levels.
I'm saying its significantly cheaper and potentially more
rewarding as a hobby than trying to play god with air quality
and a 1k budget
I don't think I agree with this dichotomy. It's like saying reading books is more fun than playing the guitar. You can do both! They're not really in conflict!And anyway, you can do a lot with indoor air quality for 1K.
In what environment? 2ppm in a small enclosed room and 2ppm in a large warehouse are very different quantities of CO2.
One common estimate for humans seems to be 1kg of CO2 exhaled per day.
A single bird's nest fern is estimated to absorb about 0.0002677kg of CO2 per day.
So about 3,700 bird's next ferns in your house for each human being should even things out. Regardless of exact numbers this seems consistent with everything I've ever read over the years, that indoor plants are nice but the amount needed to really reduce CO2 is impractical.
Edit: Found some dude who is bubbling air through plastic bottles filled with algal cultures to scrub his air. Since algae does grow pretty quickly in the right conditions, this might be pretty efficient, albeit kinda gross looking. He could dry and weigh the algae to get a pretty good estimate how much carbon he has collected, and from there calculate how much CO2 he's removing. https://www.instructables.com/Simple-Algae-Home-CO2-Scrubber...