But judge for yourself, here's what SBF has entered into the Congressional record:
https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/63981b...
https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/63981b...
I still don’t get how this could be interpreted as a “deeply concerned about someone selling $250k”, when the answer is “no I don’t think 100x that size would succeed”. From this I see one guy (C Z) who’s probably concerned about a supposedly systemic action with unclear goals, and another one (blue) fooling around a specific transaction.
I mean they could be deeply concerned as a person about whatever they projected about it, but it’s technically impossible with $250k which they admit right away. The way it was stated in the comment above is editorial, to say the least.