This is a precise description of what happened in the UK since then.
I shouldn’t have to say that, but she doesn’t owe anything to anybody and she is free to criticise the UK (and being quite spot on), whatever happened to her family 100 years ago.
https://news.sky.com/story/nhs-crisis-how-did-we-get-here-an...
Waiting an hour and a half for an ambulance when you have a stroke or heart attack is the sort of thing that has long term consequences for your recovery, even if you don't die of it immediately.
Reluctantly, and it's not clear the same courtesy would be extended today given the anti-asylum rhetoric. The history of Allied countries accepting Jewish refugees early - before it was too late - is .. patchy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_St._Louis
Yes, but now she got more options.
> I think it's important not to forget history, especially one's family's.
I don't think she did. Or what do you mean?
Factually correct. But so what?
It's the Guardian, that is their schtick. Orwell summed up this attitude well in England Your England[1]:
> In intention, at any rate, the English intelligentsia are Europeanized. They take their cookery from Paris and their opinions from Moscow. In the general patriotism of the country they form a sort of island of dissident thought. England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality. In left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution, from horse racing to suet puddings. It is a strange fact, but it is unquestionably true that almost any English intellectual would feel more ashamed of standing to attention during ‘God save the King’ than of stealing from a poor box.
Plus ça change.