No Silver Bullet Solutions to the Werewolf Crisis
progressandpoverty.substack.com
progressandpoverty.substack.com
Meanwhile, everyone argues over what a complex and nuanced problem it is. Or just says that homeless people are a bunch of junkies and crazies who simply cannot be helped.
On the other hand, decreasing demand (eg people leaving) doesn't always fix socioeconomic problems either - sometimes, once people start leaving, more people leave until you end up with an empty husk of a city eg Detroit at one point.
People need services and people also want to be around other people like them. This causes feedback loops, making the nexus of problems related to housing truly and inescapably complex.
Good housing and a thriving community with the right mix of services in the right place is complicated.
Housing that would be an improvement over homelessness is not that complicated. We just have underbuilt in the US for decades, is the short version.
I spent nearly six years homeless, I've had a college class on Homelessness and Public Policy and I've written about homelessness for years.
Being homeless and socially cut off is hard on your mental health. It's not always obvious which direction cause and effect runs.
Plenty of people have serious mental health issues and manage to largely hide it if they can remain housed, on any pertinent medication, etc. There is no direct cause and effect relationship between mental health and homelessness or drug use and homelessness.
Instead, studies show that increased rates of homelessness are more than 90 percent accounted for by rising rents in an area.
This article shows why "rule by committee" is such a unresponsive way to solve real world problems.
The bigger the committee, the higher the ratio of useless distractions to merit-worthy ideas.
Big committees surface many more, and broader, considerations. But doesn't do much in terms of vetting for quality.
The more collective (and thus diffuse) responsibility becomes when you scale up to large committees with many members, the worse it gets at filtering for quality.
Good ideas routinely get thrown out along with bad ideas at these committees, in fact the few good ideas often get drowned out by the bad ones.
Sometimes you really just need someone in the committee to say "screw this" and pick up their crossbow and show that it works, by actually DOING it.
It's often times the disaffected splinter factions on the edges of these large committees that provide the pivotal breakthroughs - in my experience.
If there is an analogy, it would be, as in the last para of the article: "(some gun control) is probably not as powerful as a real (effective gun control, like nearly every other developed country has) would be, but it's way easier to make on short notice, or by a single person (US state). Sometimes you need to stop overthinking everything and just try an idea and see if it works."
This all supposes that people would see that the idea works, understand something that they did not before, and change their minds; which I find overly charitable as applied to real-world problems. Dogma, propaganda and wilful blindness to facts known already plays a huge role.
Housing fixes everything is a lot more difficult to measure outcomes.
Also, killing werewolves increases every existing owner's property values, but increasing housing does not, and should, per economics, tend toward devaluing their precious property values.