Edit: Actually meant announcement of an increase to buyback program, not that they've already done it.
Not sure that I'd call this "admitting defeat on growth" as other people have said elsewhere in this thread, given that they've done buybacks of this magnitude before.
The main issue, it seems, is that they grew expenditures on cost of revenue and R&D (i.e. operations and capex), but revenue (advertising from family of apps, whatever revenue VR yields) did not keep pace -- in fact, it was flat on a YoY basis [2].
IMO, this doc is strong evidence that the layoffs were a bona fide good idea. Will be interesting to compare to Alphabet's tomorrow.
[1]: see the cash flow statement on page 8, the search term is "Repurchase" https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2022/q4...
[2]: revenue and income figures are broken out on page 10. costs of revenue/r&d figures on page 6.
The layoff, we can imagine, impacted maybe 15% of R&D at most.
It might still be too high in 2023, depending on what their revenue figures do in Q1/Q2. Would be interesting if they needed to do another layoff -- doesn't seem outside the realm of possibility.
covid happened, money was printed to replace lost wages but somehow it trickled up
plus people couldn't leave their house so tech companies saw booms in sales/revenue
so then inflation happened to the tune of 8% and the narrative was "if you didn't get at least an 8% raise 2019 -> 2020 -> 2021 each year you basically got a paycut"
and now we're seeing layoffs that basically feel like a reaction/counterbalance to any inflation rasies (or hires) that were given/made
"if a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear it"
"if you get an inflation-sized big raise but then get laid off, did you really get a raise at all?"