I stumbled into a few programming questions where it be confidently wrong and refuse to correct itself and it took me as long to verify it as it would have taken to research it myself.
I think people are still surprised that it's right more often than not.
Yes, it's less precise than using a tape measure, and it often gives an inaccurate answer (sometimes extremely inaccurate) but it's often an efficient thing to do, as long as you are aware of the limitations.
E.g. instead of awkwardly googling for stackoverflow questions that are somewhat related to the problem you have, you can just ask for a complete solution tailored to your needs.
In both cases, you'll have to judge the validity of the answer and you'll likely have to modify the result to some degree.
That is what a lot of writing is but it's not everything
Right now I am afraid to use it because I think it has a god complex and I’d rather not get carried away thinking it’s god. I want to know exactly what it CAN do. And not assume that it can do everything.
It’s like hiring new employees. I’d rather know what they can do than assume they can do everything.