At the risk of sounding a little callous, yeah, what did you expect? Tesla has had the same MO since Musk took over.
Though also he should still be raked over the coals.
Though also he should still be raked over the coals.
>A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of the river. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I am sorry, but it is my nature".
Should we accept that the scorpion will always sting its associates, and continue to allow them to hitch rides on frogs? Or should we prevent the scorpions from getting into a position where they can sting others once their nature is readily apparent?
I think GP's position on that question is abundantly clear
This applies to FSD. Why risk your life testing software for the benefit of Tesla? Either FSD frogs are irrationally altruistic given that Tesla is a corporation, with wealthy shareholders, they are unable to judge the risk, or they are being mislead.
Given the large number of FSD frogs enforcement seems inevitable.
Sorry if this reply comes across as mean - not a criticism of you or anything, just personally dislike that way of viewing things.
The part that I feel is on everyone who bought into FSD is that literally every expert in self driving (A field I was in directly at the time) was pretty sure Tesla was never going to get there with there hardware. Tesla supporters were quite rude denying this.