Just watch the first lecture and you won't be able to not watch the rest. It starts with making your own autograd engine in 100 lines of python, similar to PyTorch and then builds up to a GPT network. He's one of the best in the field, founder of OpenAI, then Director of AI at Tesla. Nothing like the scam tutorials that just copy-paste random code from the internet.
His entire family has had storied research careers and highly regarded in their fields. Radha Balakrishnan, his wife, is a retired theoretical physicist, their son Hari Balakrishnan is a professor of CSAIL at MIT and daughter Hamsa Balakrishnan is a professor of aeronautics at MIT.
Course Description:
Imagine you're a Greek soldier marching into battle in the front row of a phalanx. Or an Egyptian woman putting on makeup before attending an evening party with your husband. Or a Celtic monk scurrying away with the Book of Kells during a Viking invasion. Welcome to the other side of history, the 99% of ordinary people whose names don't make it into the history books—but whose lives are no less fascinating than the great leaders whose names we all know. Here you'll encounter such diverse individuals as:
a Mesopotamian hunter-gatherer making a living in one of the world's earliest permanent settlements;
an Egyptian craftsman decorating the pharaoh's tomb in the Valley of the Kings; a Minoan fleeing the island of Santorini during a volcanic eruption;
a Greek citizen relaxing at a drinking party with the likes of Socrates;
a Roman slave captured in war and sent to work in the mines; and
a medieval pilgrim on the road to Canterbury.
https://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/the-other-side-of-hi...
A lot of the courses are more like somebody reading out a textbook.
Ken Joy's lectures on Computer Graphics [2]. Prof Joy is another amazing lecturer, making the Computer Graphics topics seeming easy.
Stanford CS221 Learn AI (2019) by Percy Liang and Dorsa Sadigh. Both professors are great lecturers. Andrew Ng's ML class was great, but it was more academically tuned. CS221 is more on the practical side and is more updated as ML is progressing fast.
Micromouse 2021-2022 by UCLA [4]. It's a short series taught by graduate students and probably it's incomplete, but the content and teaching are amazing. I wish I had this kind of class when I was in school. The teaching and materials are very approachable and easy to understand. It shows how basic electronic components and basic circuitry work. It shows how to put them together and how to write simple programs to control the components. The end result is a robotic mouse that can traverse mazes with seemingly intelligence.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL49CF3715CB9EF31D
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01YSK5gIEYQ&list=PL_w_qWAQZt...
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Eh7RqggsU&list=PLoROMvodv4...
[4] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAWsHzw_h0iiz1EQEvQ9n...
Edit: added [4]
There're a lot of materials, much more than one would care. He covered many topics. I just jumped to the ones I needed to learn at the time. I had Linear Algebra background so most were just a refresher for me. As a student attending the class the first time, it might be overwhelming to learn all those material in a semester.
I liked his approach of “ideas first, rigor later”. I think after reading this book, you can easily grab a book with more formalism, if you feel lacking rigor.
I’m interested to understand where you felt the order was wrong?
When I was first introduced to the idea of solving linear equations, we already had the idea of space vectors and basis, so solving a system of equations was just an application of finding the coefficients of the linear combination.
> I liked his approach of “ideas first, rigor later”. I think after reading this book, you can easily grab a book with more formalism if you feel lacking rigor.
This sentence made me think. Maybe there was a disconnect between my experience (Physics background, bottom-up approach) and the one taught in the course (Data science for Linguistic, top-down). Each time I tried to use the notion and examples I had in mind with the students I found myself hitting a wall because they had not covered the topics yet.
The thing is that the ideas stuck and I was very grateful for that.
But we can be lucky that there are so many approaches out there to pick from.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA&list=PL848F2368C...
Although like all good storytellers, don't believe everything he says. I looked up a couple of his more bizarre anecdotes, and they usually turn out not to be true. The one example I can remember is women living close together sync'ing up their menstrual period. That turned out to be probably a case of the researchers underestimating the intricacies of the statistics necessary to show that cyclic phenomenon of not quite the same length adjust towards each other.
I came to that point about the cycle synchronization in his lecture series and I had to stop. Not entirely because of the error, but because the phenomenon he cited was controversial well before he gave those lectures. That tells me he was not one to a) update his beliefs b) predisposed to falsifying his beliefs/seeking out contrary evidence or c) acknowledge disagreement about a phenomenon
Any one or combination of those qualities makes me skeptical when one is teaching a "science". So rather than spend the rest of the series second guessing everything he said, I stopped watching. It's a shame, he's really a great lecturer.
Biology is different. Sure, at a molecule level, you can make definite conclusions. "This drug binds to that receptor."
But the kind of biology that is immediately useful to humans - where it touches on psychology or sociology - is too complex to get 100% right. So how do you do 'science' in these fields?
The answer is that you make up some cohesive theory based on existing research and do studies in that direction. You try to prove yourself right.
And it works! Theories that come out of this sort of research can turn out to be 100% true. Or 90% true - where they are wrong under some conditions, but still very useful. Or they can be complete bunk - not predictive, and a waste of time.
When anyone presents a cohesive theory of a complex system, they are probably not 100% right. Doesn't make them entirely wrong, though, and certainly not useless.
And probably hypocritically, I also want to kick back, turn off the critical side of my brain and enjoy the lectures and get some learning for free while not questioning every claim. Edutainment so to speak. But that requires a lot of trust, and if that trust seems threatened, I can't in good conscience continue my lazy learning.
Anything I have watched from Open Yale has been fantastic too. I feel like they have done a great job of curation and not just creating a list of random new class recordings.
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/
Extremely clear and satisfying lectures that covers all of basic physics. Much of it is accessible to anyone with some spare time and first year university!
MIT 16.885J Aircraft Systems Engineering, Fall 2005 [1] - the aircraft they focus on is the Space Shuttle. Amazingly demystifying. Some of the actual early designers talk there.
[0] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJczLlwp-d8&list=PLh9mgdi4rN...
[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiYhQtGpRhc&list=PL35721A60B...
It should be noted that the lecturer, Aaron Cohen, contradicts everything that has made SpaceX successful. From reusability, to innovation, to cost-cutting measures, to sticking with traditional contractors. But that is only testament to the challenges that faced SpaceX, it detracts nothing from Professor Cohen's brilliance. It's too bad that he never got to see how both cargo and manned spaceflight had progressed only a decade after his 2010 passing.
especially the section on streams (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkGKLILLy0I&list=PLE18841CAB...)
It changed my outook on programming by pi degrees and I feel it is more needed then ever.
And what if the OP knew nothing of maths before the course? A mistake it was, but I think you’re overindexing on (potentially) a brain fart.
By Jeremy, who is the founding researcher at fast.ai.
Three things I love about this series 1. Jeremy seems like a power user of Jupyter notebook and uses them beautifully to run the lectures. The book on fastai is also written in Jupyter notebooks. 2. The lectures are super hands on - Jeremy actually fires up a jupyter notebook and runs code which often surprises him 3. I love how he describes he deep dives into a specific Kaggle competition. Describes in great detail his own attempts at getting up the leaderboard. It's almost like watching a poker player reveal her decision process before they make a move.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SF_h3xF3cE&list=PLfYUBJiXbd...
MIT 6.824 Distributed Systems by Robert Morris - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQP8WApzIQQ&list=PLrw6a1wE39...
Just looking at the playlist, I'm surprised at how many lectures are focused around actual distributed databases versus purely on theory or algorithms
His opening lectures always have a surprise in them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeYBdghaIjc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m72mt4VN9ik
At the time it was cutting edge to the point where he introduced a previously undescribed optimization method (RMSProp) that was subsequently used in papers, citing the lecture slides as their reference! But still accessible to anyone with basic college math. Of course it doesn't have any of the new stuff like transformers or diffusion models, but I still consider it as giving a good foundation for understanding backprop and neural nets.
Unlike every other AI course at the time it didn't try to teach you about all the other types of machine learning. Neural nets only. After taking it I was able to apply neural nets at work with pretty great results. Also, it gave me one of my favorite quotes: "To deal with hyper-planes in a 14-dimensional space, visualize a 3-D space and say 'fourteen' to yourself very loudly. Everyone does it."
Introduction to Cryptography by Christof Paar, I wanted to understand Bitcoin's secp256k elliptic curve on finite fields: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6N5qY2nvvJE8X75VkXglSrVh...
The Maths of General Relativity by ScienceClic, I wanted to understand clearly Einstein's field equations (what the hell is a Ricci tensor) without having to read a book: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLu7cY2CPiRjVY-VaUZ69bXHZr...
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6i60qoDQhQGaGbbg-4aS...
Seminar on Macroeconomics, Randall Wray:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnw-449iRxO-BbfN55FdO...
Modern Money and Public Purpose:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zEbo8PIPSc&list=PLoGqI16J4b...
All of you have looked at rainbows, but very few of you have ever seen one!
MIT physics 801 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyQSN7X0ro203puVhQsmC...
MIT physics 802 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyQSN7X0ro2314mKyUiOI...
MIT physics 803 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyQSN7X0ro22WeXM2QCKJ...
Series on linear algebra: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDPD3MizzM2x...
Animation engine: https://github.com/3b1b/manim
It really made...the interpretation of computer programs...click with me.
And there's a meta-circular evaluator designed to fit on the number of blackboards they had available. So that's cool.
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/6-001-structure-and-interpretati...
It's a course taught at Stanford University, some of which they've released publicly for free. Here's the latest incarnation, which covers SwiftUI: https://cs193p.sites.stanford.edu
One of the earlier courses, back when it was all MVC + UIKit focussed, was how I learnt iOS dev and got a solid grasp of all the concepts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/ipad-and-iphone-applic...
Absolutely fantastic lectures, I feel very lucky they were available. Thank you Paul if you're reading!
[0]https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_tws4AXg7asrBv1MMAq4AO68...
MIT Calculus Revisited - An almost perfect no nonsense presentation (I like black boards too)
Francis Su - Real Analysis - Very engaging lecture style and great board work.
Feynman Messenger Lectures - Well its Feynman, and the content is interesting if you are still somewhat new to it.
Also StatQuest and Luis Serano for intuition/conceptualization in Stats & ML.
I have a network of channels on YouTube trying to aggregate lecture courses/series. Here are just two: https://youtube.com/@a-guess-at-the-riddle
Financial markets with Bob Shiller (Yale 2008):
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8F7E2591EE283A2E
Financial markets with Bob Shiller (Yale 2011):
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8FB14A2200B87185
Smart-as-a-whip, scathing rationality of John Geanakoplos in his financial theory course.
Financial Theory with John Geanakoplos (Yale 2011):
Speed Is Found In The Minds of People https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJJTYQYB1JQ
std::allocator Is to Allocation what std::vector Is to Vexation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIb3L4vKZ7U
An actual lecture series I've enjoyed watching is "The WE-Heraeus International Winter School on Gravity and Light", which covers General Relativity using modern mathematical approaches: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G4SqIboeig&list=PLFeEvEPtX_...
Again, I haven't done physics in 20 years, but I've found it surprisingly easy to follow because it is so clearly presented.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIljB45xT85BhzJ-oWNug...
His geometry-centric approach to linear algebra was exactly what I needed to finally grok the subject. Topics like matrix multiplication and discriminants went from "why are they defined like this? it makes no sense?" to "of course that's how you multiply matrices because it's the only logical answer".
It's only later that I discovered Wildberger has some ~strange~ very interesting ideas regarding imaginary numbers, but these ideas don't detract one bit from his presentation of linear algebra. Highly recommended viewing for anyone who is keen on neural networks and machine learning but struggles with understanding the underlying mathematics.
It covers many different fields in a shallow, introductory way (which keeps it quite approachable to non-experts). It's following a textbook, but he of course gives his own idiosyncratic takes on things.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS6Mrdpt53RyauAg8bGN-...
An hour with Bryan will teach you more about computer history and system design than most anything else.
I particularly like the monktoberfest series, and the Joyent years.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2imXor63HtS4ewIKryBL...
by Michael Ryan Clarkson
Textbook: https://cs3110.github.io/textbook/cover.html
Lectures: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLre5AT9JnKShBOPeuiD9b...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFOsw1Vccac&list=PLUl4u3cNGP...
edit: Added link
It's almost a trite recommendation because his tidbits are sampled all the time in electronic or meditation music, but they're sampled all the time because he's known for opening western minds up to eastern mysticism in a very down-to-earth approachable, comparative, compassionate, and often humorous way. Who knew that philosophy can make you laugh.
His lectures just show you a different way of looking at the world, and it's a breath of fresh air for the soul.
It starts with very basic, and cute blobs. And builds simulations around how they evolve. But as they explain the simulations, they explain how mutations might arise. It is explain how mutations can become advantageous to the point of driving predecessors extinct, or nearly extinct. And they show you how to derive math formulas for the outcome of the simulations in a very intuitive way. Also, it's entertaining as hell. I've watched the whole series at least 4 times by now. It's short, it's punchy, it's brilliant. I'd very highly recommend it.
This series teaches you so much about how a computer works from the ground up. Although I had already learned that you can build a CPU with only NAND-gates, this is what really made it click. It's also densely packed with facts and techniques (debugging, using an oscilloscope, ...). It's quite refreshing compared to other youtube content where every little fact needs a ten minute video.
I’m on the output module of the 8-bit computer, adding a register so you can store the number being output. Next is adding the bus to connect all the modules. (I end up listening to something else while making a bunch of wires, and that will take a lot of wires. I’m trying to make it look nice like Ben does.)
It got me to set up a dedicated electronics workstation and I went ahead and got myself a soldering station (more for future projects but it was useful for making a USB power cable and adding resistors to LEDs to save space) and oscilloscope (useful for seeing the glitches I’m currently having; plus it’s fun).
I’m getting into PCB design (KiCad). Started designing one for the 6502 project but I’m pausing that while I work on the 8 bit cpu project. There are definitely issues with the 8 bit project being on breadboards and/or how it’s currently hooked up such as the fact that some parts have some glitches due to poor power distribution and floating input pins that I’ll be working on. There are some good tips on /r/beneater subreddit.
I also just picked up the book he based the lectures on, to round things out. Of course, learning from Ben Eater and doing it in real life is the point where theory meets practice and you start making things in the real world.
https://www.youtube.com/@weirdboyjim James Sharman is probably worth a look for taking a home brew CPU to the next level, like his pipelined CPU which is also moved to PCBs. He also works on other things such as audio, video, etc.
There are also a ton of other system builders on YouTube making home brew Z80 and other CPU projects. Ben talks about SPI interface but I also found out how to use SPI to read/write from SD cards (John’s Basement: https://youtube.com/@JohnsBasement )
This channel is adding a cassette interface to Ben Eater’s 6502 project. I want to do that and is what actually made me decide to get an oscilloscope. https://youtube.com/@GregStrike
He's a fantastically gifted teacher and has a very deep understanding of the material, which is just a killer combination.
Osgood is such an engaging lecturer and his explanations are crystal clear.
Eigenchris' youtube series on tensors is great https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJHszsWbB6hrkmmq57lX8...
He also has video series on Tensor calculus, General Relativity and a few other topics. Its an incredible labor of love.
"How to Speak" - MIT OpenCourseWare - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unzc731iCUY
It was special because the german creator of the course broke down a car into small components and then rebuilt it.
It kinda felt like reading a neatly designed codebase.
As a engineer with huge interest in learning how something works, understanding human brain and behavior, was a logical next step for me. The lectures are more about learning ways of analyzing the mind rather than learning any specific facts.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps8jOj7diA0
Not the most sexy topic but it goes to a low level and gives you a clear picture of how memory is laid out, how functions translate to instructions from C, C++, then goes on to use Scheme and Python to show further paradigms.
The presentation is clear and it simplifies in just the right places to give you the foundations.
[0] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA&list=PL150326949...
by Michael Ryan Clarkson
Textbook: https://clarksmr.github.io/sf-lectures/textbook/lf/deps.html
Lectures: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLre5AT9JnKShFK9l9HYzk...
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi7Va_4ekko&list=PL039MUyjHR...
Can you imagine being a religion major and being forced to take a class from an atheist scientist? It was like that. Searle believes that General AI is impossible from a philosophical prospective, and the final exam requires you to defend or argue against that position. But if you argue against it you get no better than a B.
I got a B.
[1] https://youtu.be/JSntf0iKMfM?list=PLlnFrNM93wqz37TUabcXFSNX2...
[2] https://youtu.be/SAIFs_Mx8D8?list=PLlnFrNM93wqyay92Mi49rXZKs...
[3] https://youtu.be/e9khXFSU6r4?list=PLlnFrNM93wqzeZvsE_GKes91C...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_a_Machine · https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52090/52090-h/52090-h.htm
https://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/effective-communicat...
Most people think they are good communicators because they talk all the time, but talking is not communicating. The truth is that good communication is the hardest thing you will ever do.
This course literally changed how I think, write, and speak. It was so good that I listened to it twice. I even had to restart on the second attempt because my wife got hooked on it as well so we would listen to it on long road trips and discuss.
Some key lessons (taken from the website):
* How early cultural learning and deeply learned patterns of reaction in our unconscious mind affect how you see, think, and feel about other people and enhance or undermine your ability to communicate effectively
* How your sense of self develops in everyday talk during your childhood and the ways in which your subconscious is built to sustain and defend your self-esteem, shaping how you think and speak to others for the rest of your life
* The specific styles of talking you use in most situations, including different types of control talk -- the unproductive and needlessly aggressive mode that almost always dooms a conversation to a fatal downward spiral -- and the more desirable alternative of dialogue talk
The one I've personally been enjoying very much is "Category Theory for programmers" by Bartosz Milewski: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbgaMIhjbmEnaH_LTkxLI...
Especially great that they are recorded around the 2008 financial events, so some initial duration is spent on discussing those events.
Extremely good and interesting class on data structures and algorithms, with great auto-graded assignments as well.
Not lectures, but exceptionally well structured and thoughtful conversations between Bryan Magee and leading philosophers from the 80s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P2R57Axcf8&list=PLhP9EhPApK...
I wish there was a new one...
[1] http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/beyond-belief-enlighte...
[2] http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/beyond-belief-candles-...
He also has a podcast “The Idea Store”:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-idea-store/id15759...
He can speak off-the-cuff on any philosophical school of thought or historical period. The clarity of the lectures is amazing.
What a stone-cold badass.
This series on Finance Theory by Andrew Lo unfolded just during the 2007-08 crisis - so that's an added bonus as the lectures refer to ongoing events sometimes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdHlfiOAJyE&list=PLUl4u3cNGP...
This course on Open Yale called "Death".
Shelly Kagan talks about whether the soul exists, what death means for the individual, why/whether death is bad, and finally the issue of suicide.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFls3Q5bBInj_FfNLrV7g...
See also:
https://millcomputing.com/docs/
Ivan Godard is a pretty good speaker, and his discussion of how the Mill CPU works is very insightful if you are at all interested in modern CPUs work.
I don't know that we'll ever see Mill CPUs in wide use (I've been focusing on RISC-V), but there are so many interesting ideas presented in this video series. Ideas that will leave you asking: "Why do we do things the way we do now?" over and over again. One of the most interesting ideas is how the Mill CPU architecture takes into account the 2D nature of silicon lithography.
The lectures are a perfect complement to his book "Twenty lectures on algorithmic game theory".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jniaUr_7438 is the one I share most often - Dealing with difficult people
He helped me understand what money really is. He explains pretty complex things that most people have a hard time understanding, in a very simple way. I got the recommandation from another similar thread here on Hacker News.
https://www.openculture.com/2011/01/vintage_mit_calculus_les...
Herb describes the textbook as the heart/building block of the course. Unfortunately, with the textbook out of print (4ed), and later editions being reorganized, the readings chapter/section don't match up, and don't seem to cover the same content (going by the exercises), It's hard to get full coverage.
Yet, the resources at MIT and Herb himself (commenting on the youtube channel), said that any calculus text will do. I'd just like to sure of not having any gaps (or, worse, misconceptions) - that's my purpose in revisiting calculus.
If you understand german I recommend you math lessons by Christian Spannagel https://www.youtube.com/@pharithmetik. Makes some less interesting topics enjoyable.
[1] https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/joseph-campbell/t...
http://rickroderick.org/100-guide-philosophy-and-human-value...
There are probably more thorough ones out there, but I found his added perspective helpful - he's constantly asking, is this useful today? Today is 30 years ago now, but still. :)
Before listening to the series, I thought I wasn't interested in Nietzsche, but afterwards it feels like he has a point that modern culture still hasn't addressed, au contraire. Especially if you look at the dropping birth rates.
Particularly about human vision and how visual information gets processed, priority and timing, etc. Some cool experiments (upside down face recognition).
https://online.duke.edu/course/medical-neuroscience/
https://www.coursera.org/learn/medical-neuroscience
He does a good job explaining the crux of a much deeper science; his intent is mainly to provide background knowledge for aspiring doctors, but his own research is full-on neuroscience. It's a good example of topological sorting, building topics up from no-knowledge. And of course any knowledge of neuro-anatomy is humbling :)https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLez3PPtnpncSKf4E-6NAE...
Very nicely explains different evolutions of philosophical thought that helps you appreciate human knowledge and the current cultural and philosophical status quo, because the course helps you find the common thread that runs through great thinker’s debates.
His course on the Modern Political Tradition has the same effect on political thought and its the evolution. Both are on Audible as well.
Another one that I think everyone should hear is "Logical Insanity", where Dan talks through the civilian bombing campaigns of WWII. He makes a case that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki fit into this wider pattern of bombings in a really interesting way - those two events obviously loom large in our thinking about history, but in the context of WWII they were almost... mundane. Just two more bombings of civilians in a war that was full of the same. (Dan makes the case in a much more fleshed out way, so please don't take my half-assed description as an indicator of the quality of the episode).
These have all fallen behind the paywall at this point but they are well worth the money and time.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeKd45zvjcDFUEv_ohr_HdUFe...
One of the series I've picked at and skimmed at times for reference and relearning some concepts is MIT OpenCourseware's 6.006 (and other courses) taught primarily by Erik Demaine. He's much better than any instructor I had at San Jose state university and I've learned things better. Even when I watch his lectures and feel like I'm still missing some points, it's very easy to go back and review examples of his.
[0] - https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10774 [1] - https://www.quantamagazine.org/father-son-team-solves-geomet...
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP60IKRN_pFpt...
A rare combination of both extremely important and extremely interesting.
If you watch just 3 or 4 minutes, you'll struggle to stop watching.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/history-of-the-interna...
I come back to it over and over because it’s fractally interesting, from discussions of nation-state grand strategy to how FDR made strategic use of a martini.
https://leonardbernstein.com/about/educator/norton-lectures
Also, see his talks for young people:
https://leonardbernstein.com/lectures/television-scripts/you...
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKiz0UZowP2V0mwtNv1lc1_...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7HrM-fk_Rc&list=PL7ddpXYvFX...
>This is one of 18 videos representing lectures on digital photography, from a version of my Stanford course CS 178 that was recorded at Google in Spring 2016.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLruBu5BI5n4aFpG32iMbdWoRV...
I find it more approachable than the book, and taken as a whole I think he makes a compelling argument for a Bayesian world-view.
Stanford course on NLU was pretty good for basic overview https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tZ_Jrc_nRJY (2019, so a bit dated now.)
Was recently enjoying Paul Cantor on Shakespeare and politics: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCiopo73uhXPiA3yJV_rg72Q
Not a series per se but I always enjoy hearing John Mearsheimer present his ideas: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TsonzzAW3Mk
A nice debate with terry eagleton and roger scruton, who has many really excellent lectures on YouTube: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qOdMBDOj4ec
* Donald Sadoway's Solid-State Chemistry lectures: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL36EC6A6180271B0F
* Anything by Patrick Winston, e.g. "AI": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP63gFHB6xb-k...
* robert ghrist's calculus lectures, which were somehow clearer/more engaging than others I had found: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKc2XOQp0dMwj9zAXD5Ll...
Someone already mentioned Ben Eater's Building an 8-bit computer. Nans2Tetris [1] is a similar course but completely in software, where you start from logic gates and end up with a fully functioning OS. Checkout the cool projects students built on top. [2]
[0] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrxfgDEc2NxZJcWcrxH3j...
The professor does an excellent job at explaining every detail, and the lectures end up being even fun. I've enjoyed this a lot.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/@JimKurose/videos [2] https://gaia.cs.umass.edu/kurose_ross/lectures.php
[0] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbgaMIhjbmEnaH_LTkxLI...
Althou I have no medical background, I somehow manage to keep the pace with all the old biochemistry knowledge I picked up in grammar school 25 years ago. But it's a tough ride :)
[1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFLlboeliKwkpEUJQF45d3A
https://www.deepmind.com/learning-resources/introduction-to-...
This classic 10 part course, taught by Reinforcement Learning (RL) pioneer David Silver, a popular resource for anyone wanting to understand the fundamentals of RL.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9_jI1bdZmz2emSh0UQ5i...
He makes excellent use of visuals and well-crafted examples to get core concepts across without getting bogged down in details that aren't well-suited to a lecture format.
Most of us know very little about early American civilizations. Prof Barnhart's lecture series did wonders for expanding my knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji5_MqicxSo
The last life lessons you wish to pass to your children...
1. Finance by Andrew Lo from MIT
2. Adaptive Markets by Andrew Lo from MIT
3. Valuation by Aswath Damodaran NYU
It is a very deep dive into the text of the book. A weekly episode that usually gets through less than a page of the book. It has recently passed Episode 250.
Episode so far are all on Youtube or downloadable as podcasts.
https://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/cosmology-the-histor...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EmboKQH8lM&list=PLmmYSbUCWJ...
https://www.youtube.com/@SpartacanUsuals/playlists
And Werner Krauth's
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL848F2368C90DDC3D
Absolutely brilliant and engaging explanations of some difficult to understand topics. Especially lesson 22 on Emergence and Complexity has been an eye opener.
A topic that's usually only discussed in an emotionally charged climate.
You might not like it if you are a believer in Jesus, although Bart Ehrman tries not to challenge any belief. The flip side is that you might not like it if you are a non-believer, since he spends a certain amount of time trying to massage the message so that not to offend believers. Still, I think you'd enjoy the course more as a non-believer.
It's a history course. It shows how historians can extract valuable information given little (and often time contradictory, and sometimes forged) historical data. You can take these lessons then and try to apply them everywhere. It's going to change the way you perceive history.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2J7wSuFRl8&list=PLEA18FAF1A...
I don't know why, I've listened it through more than once and enjoyed it a lot.
If you have any interest in astronomy, cosmology, astrophysics or just want to understand the world we live in in a greater context, then watch ist. It is worth your time, and blows every astronomy TV show out of the water.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLez3PPtnpncSF2QwpCB9C3FBF...
https://stephenjressler.com/the-great-courses/
Very Spartan in presentation, yet very substantial.
The lectures are free and the course can also be taken as part of OMSCS.
Fantastic course really. It teaches something new and the theory behind it all is really interesting.
Other top-rated OMSCS courses such as CS6200 GIOS are really good as well.
https://stevenpinker.com/psy-1-introduction-psychological-sc...
I loved the CS253 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1y1iaEtjSYiiSGVlL1cH... made by Feross Aboukhadijeh
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL023BCE5134243987
Very engaging lecture. Some parts are surprisingly relevant to this day.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00729d9
Also John McWhorter lectures are usually very interesting and fun to listen to.
https://www.coursera.org/learn/mathematical-thinking?
This brought me what math is about:)
Amazing set of speakers and pretty timeless advice for starting a startup
If you would like to sample it before patronising either of those two businesses, it seems to have been uploaded on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNINJcoBa_A&list=PLOxODW9vlV...
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0INsTTU1k2UCpOfRuMDR-wlv...
This was a set of lectures given by Faraday for the Royal Institution’s “Christmas lectures for young people”.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chemical_History_of_a_Cand...
[0]: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL80I41oVxglKcAHllsU0txr3O...
The intro-psych lectures are part of my morning walking routine.
Other people have linked some Feynman lectures, but they are only in written form. These ones you can actually watch (though u may need to blast the volume to max at times)
[0]https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoaVOjvkzQtyjhV55wZcdicAz...
[0] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLez3PPtnpncSF2QwpCB9C...
(She also held lectures in the US in the 70s, but I couldn't find any recordings in English.)
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL22J3VaeABQBlN8DUor7SKWCw...
bidirectional programming is something I like a lot, never thought an evaluator could be encoded like that
He is mostly hysterical in his most avatars. But comes back to centre
Not hugely insightful or something, but if anyone wants to get into game dev, it’s a great start.
Through this course I can into contact with Lua & LÖVE and still enjoy both a lot (only in hobby projects).
- Harvard Stat 110: awesome and somewhat challenging lecture series on probability. It goes into all the probability basics, but also goes into problem solving skill very often, so the problem sets tended to be hard as I recall it. But the nice thing is that a lot of it you can find the solutions which are very well written -- and for the exams as well. Also, the lecturer Joe Blitzstein won best professor at Harvard if I'm not mistaken. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2SOU6wwxB0uwwH80KTQ6...
- Statistical Rethinking by Richard Malkreath: man this one will make you relearn statistics. And with a heavy bayesian flavor, which if you hadn't had the chance to learn, will bend your mind as well. You will learn to build models that can describe a lot of situations in the real world, and estimate the parameters from data. Cool stuff if you ask me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYUykHScxj8&list=PLDcUM9US4X...
- Frank Harrel's Bioistatistics for biomedical reasearch: Frank Harrel is the go to guy to understand how to use data in clinical trials and diagnostics research. His book Regression Modeling strategies is a gem that every data scientist should read. This lecture series is aimed at biomedical researches, ie. people without a strong background in theoretical statistics. In the lectures he talks about the best practices and pitfalls you'll come accross when doing and reading research, and also explain some R code to do a better job. Harrel also wrote some very important R packages i.e. Hmisc and rms. https://www.youtube.com/@bbrcourse6203/videos
- calling bullshit in the era of big data: this is a last year course so it is very laid back in the discussions. I didn't go through the whole thing. But what I watched I remember it was really nice and thought provoking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2OtU5vlR0k&list=PLPnZfvKID1...
- statistical learning by Hastie and Tibshirani: these are the guys that wrote the two main books on statistical learning. If one wants to get into DS, this is the place to start. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvySJGj-88U&list=PLoROMvodv4...
- Discrete Differential Geometry by Keenan Crane: ok, I didn't see the whole thing, because it was above my understanding. But the graphics and images are so eye catching I almost wanted to just sit there watching. I'm pretty sure this and his computer graphics lectures are aso engaging as hell and hidden gems of the internet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mas-PUA3OvA&list=PL9_jI1bdZm...
And, yes, I've read some of the criticisms of his work. They seem to take issue with the tiniest claims, even go so far as labeling his work as "dangerous"[0]. "Harari’s motives remain mysterious". It's hilarious.
[0] https://www.currentaffairs.org/2022/07/the-dangerous-populis...