Protect IP Author Senator Patrick Leahy Says 'Further Study' is Needed
leahy.senate.gov
leahy.senate.gov
"Hey, a lot of people don't want more Internet controls. So lets get them involved in the Internet control discussion by playing on their hopes of less Internet control. Their supporters will lose momentum as people say 'discussions are ongoing'. We can then easily pass more anti-Internet stuff when we can as we have done in the past. It's brilliant."
I'm sorry but no thank you. I don't trust you money grubbing ass hats to enact the bill properly; I'm not going to trust you to study the already passed bill properly.
I worked closely with the ISPs in drafting this provision to ensure they were comfortable with how it would work
This sounds like BS:
I remain confident that the ISPs – including the cable industry, which is the largest association of ISPs – would not support the legislation if its enactment created the problems that opponents of this provision suggest.
At best, that second quote reflects a real misunderstanding of the big ISPs and their interests.
on the internet means not bumping ratings
Raising transactional costs for new sites is good for them. It keeps the media properties more valuable, and it raises the percentage of their traffic they can monetize. Roughly the same payoff as in a non-net neutrality world.
So I went looking and it turns out I'm completely wrong. Check it out -- the WSJ did this interactive chart that shows Congress hit a low in the early '80s and has been aging ever since:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-CONGRE...