what would today's conclusion be?
what would today's conclusion be?
Somewhat related - how does copyright work on the output of these AIs? Can a piece of code be the copyright owner of a picture?
the person who pressed the button to start the AI generation for that particular output _should_ own the copyright to it (and also be liable for the infringement if it does).
No. Copyright requires a human creator.
So, the conclusion might be the actual opposite that AI will first achieve human level creativity before (if ever) acquiring human functional skills.
Figuring out a way to use your love of panting in order to provide a marketable product or service requires creativity, but I'm not sure Dall-E succeeds on that front. What marketable service it is able to provide has been left to the creativity of the humans who operate OpenAI.