Spaghetti-Tree Hoax
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Of course, growing up in an Italian family in Oregon, I knew perfectly well what spaghetti was made of, which made the documentary even more hilarious.
When we visited my grandmother near Portland, there would always be two big platters of spaghetti, one with the usual red sauce, and one with pesto!
We called that "spaghetti with green stuff" and always dug into it first. My aunt made her pesto with a mortar and pestle the old fashioned way.
One of my projects for this year is to get a marble mortar and olivewood pestle, and make pesto like that. Here's the recipe I'm starting with:
It's not super-cheap (I use good olive oil), but I'd definitely call that "for the faint of heart": pesto is one of the easiest sauces you can make for pasta and is very forgiving (you can vary ingredients, texture, it's ). You don't need to make pesto by the kilogram :)
Try LeGrand pesto. It can be a bit difficult to find, but Whole Foods usually has it. Seriously, it's head and shoulders above any other pesto I've had (store bought, restaurant or homemade). We've been using it for like 15 years now.
Spaghetti as an exotic delicacy, rare enough that people could believe this story. The past truly is a far off and alien land.
It really seems that English cuisine improved a lot since then.
Spaghetti in tins (and I won't even dare to think about the quality of the "tomato sauce") is a crime against nature.
I wonder, though, if the 1950s Brits were mostly thrown off by the specific Italian word, "spaghetti", or if the entire concept of pasta/noodles would have been lost on them.
-- https://qnholifield.com/culinary-history/the-hidden-history-...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVo_wkxH9dU
It’s a family affair in Switzerland, unlike “large spaghetti plantations” in Italy.
I have to wonder what her mind conjured up once it came out as a hoax, as she'd surely told everyone close to her by then.
Twenty years after the Spaghetti Tree broadcast, a vox pop of some gorgeous Brits painfully misunderstanding how, well, everything works, is my favourite 'I can't believe people thought that...' historical video.
https://twitter.com/BBCArchive/status/1092120538259038209
I wonder if there's any contemporary examples of otherwise seemingly modern societies resisting something like metrication due to a basic comprehension failure.
"We ruled the world once didn't we?" is a depressing attitude and an attitude that has only got more entrenched as they've aged leading to brexit and the awful consequences.
It seems absolutely wild that as recently as 1957, something as mundane as spaghetti was "relatively unknown in the UK". (Unless we are being meta-pranked...)
The article mention "hundreds phoned in the following day to question the authenticity of the story or ask for more information about spaghetti cultivation and how they could grow their own spaghetti trees". Of course it is unclear how many of these "hundreds" called to call bullshit, and how many called to get spaghetti-growing tips. Given Aprils Fools was a well known tradition at the time, it is possible some of the callers was in on the joke.
We have no idea how many people actually believed the hoax.
This is true, but I regulary read a satire magazin - and the readers letter are quite funny and scary, because I could not believe how many people do take BS seriously. Now of course, they could all be satire, too (but elaborate one, because from seemingly real FB accounts), but maybe keep in mind, how many people did (and still do) believe Covid was a hoax. And that there is an actual flat earth society.
We are not. I grew up in Denmark in the sixties. We really weren't lacking for anything, but spaghetti strictly came out of a tin together with some strange orange tomatoish sauce.
I graduated highschool in 1977. Everybody went to Copenhagen for a night on the town. That's were I saw the first pizza of my life.
Nothing late night, of course. Everybody was soundly in bed by 22:30.
https://www.historylink.org/file/20557
> By September 1949 The Seattle Times was touting the joint and its palpable history: "For a sentimental journey to an almost-vanished Seattle, and some fine Italian food, try ... Daverso's Palace Grill ... The huge old mahogany back bar, the tiled floors and walls, and the checkered tablecloths will make you nostalgic, and the king-size menu will make you hungry. A couple of specialties: Pizza, the hot pastry that looks like a phonograph record, covered with mushrooms, cheese and tomatoes ..." (Lund, "A La Carte").
> The fact that a writer for The Seattle Times in 1949 felt obligated to describe what a pizza looks like was simply because few in the area had ever seen or tried one. As Frank Daverso would later recall: "We had to give it away for the first four years. Nobody had ever heard of it. Customers liked our spaghetti and ravioli, so we'd give 'em a sample of pizza with each order. They seemed to like pizza but just wouldn't order it. Finally, we tried advertising. Sailors and other servicemen, who had eaten pizza in the East, began coming in and soon it caught on -- but it took four long years"
Anyway, despite the amused look on my parents' faces I think I was probaly fooled, but I was only 5.
Turns out, his teachers might have been on to something.
Ah, found it: https://reprobatepress.com/2022/04/01/jurassic-mansion-the-b...
https://misc.rural.narkive.com/cEsySUGR/california-s-velcro-...
In an odd coincidence, I had dinner last week with the brand protection attorney for Clorox!
From the VELCRO® Brand video:
If you need something to clean up your socks,
Do it with bleach, and not with [censored]
And here's an article with some other clever and compassionate "cease and desist" trademark notices:https://www.cll.com/OnMyMindBlog/creativity-can-make-tradema...
But I don't get it.
How is being the default brand not good for them?
Do they really want everything to be called "hook and fastner"?
(I've heard that Heinz was prevented from using the name "Ketchup" in some country, as "ketchup" was considered generic for tomato paste, and Heinz didn't meet the legal definition - too much sugar or too few tomatoes.)
Like how in a lot of countries every brand of vacuum cleaner is a "hoover", or any brand of permanent marker is a "sharpie", etc.
> A bumper crop is a very large amount. Most often, the term bumper crop is used to describe a high yield of harvest in an agricultural endeavor, but it may be used figuratively to mean a large amount of something. The expression bumper crop came into common use around 1830, but the word bumper dates back farther. In the 1600s, a bumper was an extra large wine cup that when filled to the brim, held a great amount of wine. By the 1700s, the word bumper was used in conversation to mean a large amount of something. By 1830, this definition of the word bumper came to be used mostly in the expressions bumper crop and bumper year.
> Dickens wrote in 1839, “This charming actress will be greeted with a bumper,” meaning a crowded house at the theater.
The description of the life cycle of ratchet screwdriver fruits remains a masterpiece.
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/23/world/nuclear-prank-in-bu...
I remember seeing that aired live on the national TV. Fun times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/arts/design/24abroad.html
When you get to the other end, you'll be able to joke about both sides of the conversation.
[edit] I think it's a healthy thing to not want your mass media to come from one source, whether capitalist or communist, and especially not to be fucked with in terms of basic facts and cause mass panic as a result of capitalists or communists trying to prove a childish point. I'm no slave to either side's propaganda, I just recognize nasty people and nasty power plays disguised as politics when I see them.
Also, if you look at my posts for more than a passing moment, I think it's pretty unfair to say I don't maintain an open or critical mind toward every fucking thing. So snappy, thoughtless (and frankly uncritical) one liners like yours don't deserve the attention I'm giving it. You're welcome.
I dislike communism as much as capitalism, but what I dislike the most is the brainwashed americans who blame everything on the communist boogieman.
> 20-25 years to enjoy living as a communist before you have to make money. Don't believe my experience, it sounds like you're already living it yourself.
haha, really now ?
I'm actually not this, but it is quite specific and telling that you have this American boogieman in your mind. I don't even know any Americans like this... most of them I think died by the early 2000s.
I do have a somewhat clear understanding of living under single-party rule and blanketed by state-controlled media in Vietnam, and can compare and contrast that to the liberal free market of information which you are free to label "capitalist propaganda" in the West. The difference of course is that it's not actually propaganda when it's chaotic and not organized by a state organ - in the capitalist case, it's just advertising. The difference is measured in menace and the threat of personal violence.
The second part of your reply is taxi level conversation, so I will leave it at that.
I assumed that was intended as a personal attack.
>> taxi level conversation
clearly a personal attack, given my bio.
None of your responses addressed my points - all of them were superficial, flaming, insulting and dismissive. I hoped to draw you into actual conversation, but there was nothing there.
So how did you come to your conclusion?
That's where I got my opinion.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/10/30/241797346...
> "Far fewer people heard the broadcast — and fewer still panicked — than most people believe today. How do we know? The night the program aired, the C.E. Hooper ratings service telephoned 5,000 households for its national ratings survey. 'To what program are you listening?' the service asked respondents. Only 2 percent answered a radio 'play' or 'the Orson Welles program,' or something similar indicating CBS. None said a 'news broadcast,' according to a summary published in Broadcasting. In other words, 98 percent of those surveyed were listening to something else, or nothing at all, on Oct. 30, 1938. This miniscule rating is not surprising. Welles' program was scheduled against one of the most popular national programs at the time — ventriloquist Edgar Bergen's Chase and Sanborn Hour, a comedy-variety show."
And by the way, why are you defending the idea of scaring the fuck out of the population with made-up lies on mass media?
I suspect parent's point is that the story is a myth, and is demonstrably wrong.
The suggestion, and this [0] Slate article repeats it, that it was a ploy by newspapers of the day to discredit radio as a source of reliable information. I also recall it coming up on QI (BBC) a few years back.
The rest of your invective doesn't invite a response.
[0] https://slate.com/culture/2013/10/orson-welles-war-of-the-wo...
To whose benefit is it to commit arson in the sphere of public information, to cause panic and to obliterate trust in journalism?
Invective implies that this question is driven from some personal anger; it isn't. It's driven by a moral belief in the virtue of telling the truth, and not spreading rumors or lies.
I'm guessing the ventriloquist's ventriloquism wasn't the star of that show since, ventriloquist, on Radio, Not. So. Funny.
It was mostly a panic in the newspapers. There wasn't actually any real mass panic over the broadcast. It mostly just isolated people calling police stations to confirm whether it was real, and most of those were people who only heard a very small part and thought it might be a military invasion not space aliens.
https://www.spaghettitree.co.uk/
https://www.spaghettitreesutton.co.uk/
Apparently in Oz too
I wonder if he was influenced by this hoax.
Wew, that’s a false claim if I’ve ever seen one.
Edit: rom-antics: Duly noted, thanks for the advice.