People with little talent and unimportant messages want to write like Alan Paton[1].
The point they miss is that it worked for Alan Paton because he had a lot of talent and very important messages.
I've seen talentless hacks do something similar, copying the narrative quality of Doctor Manhatten from the Watchmen novel, not realising that it worked for him because he was a being who lived outside of time, but it just makes them look stupid.
[1] "Cry, The Beloved Country", which is one of the more powerful books I've read in my life thus far, next to 1984 and similar. People who virtue signal (you know who you are) should read this; the struggle was real, human grief knows no race boundaries.
also occasionally can be a younger college woman who tries to act super chill and friendly with everyone, may behave somewhat like a bro she likes and often thinks that doing fratty things is cool. like omg can u believe we pounded so much tequila last night and we blacked out at sig epi chi and audrey fell into a bush while i peed on the side of the house. totally ripped my skirt in half, im such a hot mess. like guys are we going to the delta chi social tonight, i literally cant stand chad but still think i might hookup w him again
basically that aesthetic.
More seriously, some redundancy helps with some data corruption. We don't need capital letters; we could let the punctuation show us where the sentence ends. On the other hand, we don't need the punctuation, either; we could let the capital letters show us where the next sentence starts. But having both lets us figure out things like "did the author insert a period there as a typo, or is that really the end of the sentence?"
I get it for comments or social media statuses, but if you're writing long form text you want somebody over 30 to read, reaching over to the shift key is probably worth it. This was a good read but it was annoying, like a nice book transcribed into Comic Sans.