TeX and LaTeX in industry applications
tex.stackexchange.com
tex.stackexchange.com
So, much like anything open source vs. Microsoft, you will get excellent results for low effort with the Microsoft tools when doing anything "normal". When doing something really unusual, turn to TeX because it will be easier to wrangle than Word.
For example, I tried really hard to use TeX for my resume. It was a tremendous pain for weeks, and the most popular template hadn't been updated since 1970. I switched to Word and made a better resume in about twenty minutes. On the other hand, when working on a hundred-page collaborative report with a team of eight people working together through a VCS, TeX was a godsend- most notably for \include, inherited layouts, figures, and citations. (Each of which is easy for an individual in Word, but hard to manage with eight people)
If you have basic LaTeX skills, you get excellent results for low effort with LaTeX when doing anything normal.
For example, I tried really hard to use TeX for my resume. It was a tremendous pain for weeks, and the most popular template hadn't been updated since 1970.
As far as my resume is concerned, I can't share your complaint: using an up-to-date template generated by somebody else, it was very easy to adjust it to my needs to get a decent looking resume in no time.
(La)TeX can be quite a hassle for some (mostly complex) issues. But especially for easy tasks, it beats Word and alike easily IMO.
Not sure if you meant TeX as in plain TeX, or TeX as in the system in general. But there are many templates, many of them reasonably contemporary. For example see the ones at http://www.ctan.org/keyword/vita .
My anecdotal evidence - my professors stopped using it after 15 years around the year 2000 if not earlier. Writing a simple document in Bulgarian was an extreme hassle for me. Selecting the correct packages, setting up your environment (weird encoding errors in both Windows and Fedora).
Getting HTML to high-quality print status is easier than it used to be, but frankly, it just wasn't designed with printed reports in mind.
The SE comments note that while your colleagues may be impressed with the niceness of your reports, they will be annoyed when they need to edit them: this is my experience as well.
The usual competing tool for this is Word. But coordination of multiple contributions in Word docs can be a hassle, even with the tracking features of Word.
But you can use LaTeX and a good VCS to track and merge changes. Kind of slick. Works best with academic or quasi-academic collaborators, of course.
Most of the automation-type applications mentioned in the thread probably could also use HTML+CSS, which is what I prefer for this stuff now.
I don't know anyone who has used HTML+CSS in a research proposal.
It was probably installed by ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Davis_%28programmer%29 ), but he was gone by that point.
The system was running on a couple of the Sparcstations and at that time (97) the zon was switching to Alpha.
I remember looking at that the build system and thought that it was "unsupportable" by myself or any other systems admin there at that time.
Recently, I've wrote some docs in LaTeX and was told to convert it to Word/Confluence.
With Tex-based publishing workflows, authoring and editing is typically done using Latex (in tandem with a Latex-aware text editor, and typesetting phase is carried out with a Tex-based form as well.
An alternative workflow used by several Context-based publishers (Context is an alternative format for Tex, now tied to Luatex) is to use one of several XML-based authoring software and turn the XML document into Context for typesetting.
The standard alternative is Word.
I don't think so. The stock standard LaTeX templates are not that good looking compared to the kind of reports presentations etc a competent guy versatile in graphic design (not necessarily a graphic designer) can achieve -- perhaps even using some ready made presentation/report template bundled with his office suite or third-party.
Slightly better typography is the main advantage, but people would fell asleep reading a LaTeX template report or presentation. Lack of color, imagery, drab looking charts and diagrams etc --unless you really dive full in and peruse all of LaTeX. And it's not like anyone sweats over typography details when reading a bloody report.
Beautifying Latex and Beamer is really not that difficult. An issue, though, is that the techniques to do so are different to those used in standard graphic design.
http://www.hartwork.org/beamer-theme-matrix/
I wouldn't say that Beamer presentation themes are any better --actually worse--, than what's included with Pages/Powerpoint.
http://jobmob.co.il/blog/beautiful-resume-ideas-that-work/
It's not as if your potential boss will be delighted because the hyphenation spacing and kerning is just perfect --but a touch of cleverness and color can get far.