Rutgers Finds Shocking 500% Increase in Autism in New York-New Jersey Region
scitechdaily.com
scitechdaily.com
Considering that in 2000 the idea that a girl without intellectual disabilities could be autistic was rather radical, I guess that "increase" may not necessarily describe the actual growth of measured thing.
(that said, being incredibly annoyed at vagueness of these questions is kinda a hint already)
My eldest had high school friends diagnosed with autism who seemed higher functioning than either of my children.
As an adult, he is certainly neuro-divergent in a significant way but not autistic. Having extra help in his early grades was absolutely necessary. He’s doing pretty well.
FYI these terms are considered passe now.
There is no "functioning" scale, and autism is a brain type that includes a spectrum of attributes that differ from median of population, that has no severity. Specific symptoms might have severity.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/12/28/adderall-risks-much-mo...
TLDR is that you seem to be right (with the caveat that "a doctor who doesn't really care" seems to describe the majority of doctors)... but that still doesn't really explain why someone would fake autism to get access to amphetamines.
The 500% increase was in the subset of people without major difficulties, so totally expected and not shocking at all.
It's like the count of mild coronavirus cases rising when you start widespread testing rather than only the ones that end up in hospital with related symptoms.
At this point, it's either complete incompetence by health regulators, or malice. There are clearly environmental factors at play!
Once a student is an adult, only they can release that information. Additionally the parents of a student are not allowed to access records once the student is an adult. (No calling the school to get their kid’s grades.)