If that were true, influences wouldn’t exist. Clearly they can make money because they add value for people.
If that value is actually improving people’s lives it’s another matter, but from an economics standpoint it seems to exist.
If that value is actually improving people’s lives it’s another matter, but from an economics standpoint it seems to exist.
I'm all for people sharing their knowledge and hobbies to inform others but the term 'influencer' has a connotation in which they are earning money from 'influencing' others and that seems an awful lot like basic advertising to me.
And I'm all for them getting paid to do so. I'm not sure where you draw the line. Is a cocktail influencer sharing a cool hobby or pushing a product? The answer is usually "both." So where do they fit in for you?
Whether or not they monetize that via advertising or not it’s largely irrelevant to that value proposition.