It's not the kind of censorship resistance which opposition in country with an oppressive regime might need, and in general not a solution against censorship by state-level actors.
Well, fair. Also, fun and lightweight, no browser needed.
It's not the kind of censorship resistance which opposition in country with an oppressive regime might need, and in general not a solution against censorship by state-level actors.
Well, fair. Also, fun and lightweight, no browser needed.
Whether you think that's a good or necessary thing probably tracks very closely with your beliefs about whether money and its expenditure is protected speech. Obviously that's something about which the highest courts and legislative bodies in the USA already have complex and sometimes-contradictory views, so I certainly won't claim there's a single correct answer...even if my personal beliefs fall very much on the "money is a modern social fiction in no way connected to fundamental human rights" side of the spectrum.
Not sure what you expect?