Google Can't Break Anti-Trust Laws Because It Doesn't Have A Monopoly

This article is very ignorant. The Clayton Anti-Trust Act doesn't require a monopoly as a prerequisite. It specifically addresses tying products that materially reduce competition.

You can compare them to Microsoft's "tying" arguments, you can argue about whether this applies to "free" products, you can argue about whether they are substantially reducing competition. This "journalist" should actually learn the laws before deciding the laws clearly back up their world view.