I pay her money because I am glad to have her pushing back against the tide of cash funding crypto promotion.
The other two have Patreons that I also support:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/05/29/molly-w...
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/07/11/business/meet-molly-w...
https://www.protocol.com/fintech/molly-white-web3-crypto-ske...
Doesn't mean the criticisms aren't necessary or good, just speaking to the issue of whether you've found a shoestring operation, barely able to survive.
You know, some people just look good? From the photos you linked, the second one even has rather unflattering lighting.
As long as we're making unsupported allegations, can you prove that you aren't funded by the crypto industry or otherwise benefiting financially from crypto? Because it seems suspicious that you're going to go out of your way to produce high-quality FUD for free.
The very fact that they went through the effort and expense to stage some photos for the article means someone is being propagandized. Yes, they do that in other stories -- those are PR-driven too.
>As long as we're making unsupported allegations, can you prove that you aren't funded by the crypto industry or otherwise benefiting financially from crypto?
I didn't provide FUD -- I didn't even dispute the core these that White's ideas are worth listening to! I simply disputed one lesser, ancillary point that I think was over-the-top: that White is somehow short on funding or ability to get her message out.[3] Since you didn't do your research, I even personally made one of the very same criticism[2] as in her annotations.
So tell me, what about my writing made you miss the point this much?
[1] http://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34360188
[3] A point which would still be valid even if she weren't the one prompting these stories, by the way.