Definitely more manageable, especially when it comes to alignment, multi-page tables and fonts.
Previous template: https://github.com/denysvitali/cv Rendered: https://github.com/denysvitali/cv/blob/master/main.pdf
Definitely more manageable, especially when it comes to alignment, multi-page tables and fonts.
Previous template: https://github.com/denysvitali/cv Rendered: https://github.com/denysvitali/cv/blob/master/main.pdf
[1]: https://github.com/denysvitali/cv-2
[2]: https://cv.denv.it/
Unless you are applying for TV/Movies/Modeling....
Hiring person might have a bias against people with blonde/brown/black hair. Oh! they look like they are cocky and difficult. This person reminds me of my ex, there is no way I could be in the same office.....
This list of biases are endless. Sexism/Racism/Ableism/Ageism/etc are all given a free pass if you include a picture, but become various shades of obscure without it.
jk, I do benefit from white privilege and with a name as common as John Smith I am sure I pass many other unseen/unknown-to-me hurdles.
I wasn't trying to argue/fight or even educate, simply carrying on the conversation as I thought it was occurring. Explain my thought process and reasoning for questioning the practice. If you feel confronted, I humbly apologize.I know that in some countries it is suggested to not put a picture on the CV because they want to be as unbiased as possible - but this is generally not an issue where I live.
In any case, as an Hiring Manager I do appreciate seeing the faces of the candidates on their CVs. It adds some personality to the CVs that are generally just black & white.
But again, this is very cultural and might be seen in the wrong way in, say, the US.